The latest trademark news covers Max Healthcare’s legal win over Maxcure Hospitals for trademark infringement and new US rules for foreign applicants. Key updates also include Kingfisher’s licensing move in New Zealand and a GI application for Uttarakhand Thulma.
Read more about Max Healthcare Defeats Maxcure Hospitals in Trademark Infringement, New US Trademark Rules for Foreign Applicants, Kingfisher Resurfaces in New Zealand and Other NewsTag: Indian trademark law
Leading Food Products Company
A leading food products company optimised its trademark portfolio through rigorous due diligence and compliance checks. The resulting actions improved legal clarity, reduced costs, and enhanced alignment with business goals.
Read more about Leading Food Products CompanyMaking a Mark – Framing Strategy for India
This article discusses trademark strategy in India, with a focus on attaining and protecting famous trademark status. It analyses the criteria for fame and the legal risks of genericization, offering structured guidance for brand protection.
Read more about Making a Mark – Framing Strategy for IndiaSamsung in Trouble over Smartwatches, Lifebuoy Trademark Victory, ITC Wins GI Infringement Case and Other News
The post examines recent developments in Indian and international trademark law, including the Lifebuoy trademark victory, ITC’s GI infringement case, and Samsung’s ongoing legal challenges. It provides structured legal updates and practical insights on brand protection.
Read more about Samsung in Trouble over Smartwatches, Lifebuoy Trademark Victory, ITC Wins GI Infringement Case and Other NewsZippo Manufacturing Company v. Anil Moolchandani & Ors. , High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Zippo Manufacturing, granting a permanent injunction against the sale of counterfeit lighters infringing its trademark. The Court recognized the distinctiveness of Zippo’s lighter design and awarded damages to the plaintiff.
Read more about Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Anil Moolchandani & Ors. , High Court of DelhiWho Owns the Castle?
The Delhi High Court addressed a trademark passing off dispute over the CASTLE mark in the beer industry. The court granted an injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from using the marks CASTLE and OLDCASTLE, emphasising the importance of protection against misrepresentation.
Read more about Who Owns the Castle?History and Evolution of the Trademark System
This article examines the historical roots and gradual evolution of the trademark system, from ancient identification marks to formal legal protection. It outlines the development of trademark law, with particular reference to British and Indian legislative milestones.
Read more about History and Evolution of the Trademark SystemKylie Jenner Sued Over ‘Born to Sparkle’, Vans – NASA collaboration for Space Age Shoes, Alibaba Emerges Victorious in a Trademark Battle and other news
This article summarises recent legal developments in trademark law, including key cases involving Kylie Jenner, Vans, and Alibaba. It also presents new statistics from the Indian Trademark Office and highlights updates in brand licensing and geographical indications.
Read more about Kylie Jenner Sued Over ‘Born to Sparkle’, Vans – NASA collaboration for Space Age Shoes, Alibaba Emerges Victorious in a Trademark Battle and other newsRanbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., 1988 Arb. L. R. 315
The Delhi High Court’s ruling in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. addresses key issues of trademark infringement and consumer confusion in pharmaceuticals. The case reinforces the legal standards for similarity and passing off in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., 1988 Arb. L. R. 315Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora and another, 1999 Arb. L. R. 620
This post analytically discusses the Yahoo trademark case, addressing the legal principles of passing off and domain name infringement in India. It provides a structured overview of the dispute between Yahoo Inc. and Akash Arora, highlighting the court’s reasoning and decision.
Read more about Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora and another, 1999 Arb. L. R. 620