Indian Patent Law | Intellepedia

Is Statement of Working of Patents For Public Interest?

The post analyses whether the statement of working of patents in India truly advances public interest or remains a procedural formality. It argues that while mandatory, its enforcement does not substantially benefit the public or the innovation ecosystem.

Misunderstood World of Patents!

This article analyses common patent myths and clarifies key aspects of patent law in India. It offers insights on patent eligibility, enforcement, and the importance of professional advice for effective intellectual property protection.

Introduction to Pre-grant & Post-grant Oppositions to Patent Applications

This post provides an analytical overview of pre-grant and post-grant opposition provisions in Indian patent law. It explains the procedural and substantive changes introduced by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005.

IP Event held in honor of Late Hitesh Barot

I-HIPP hosted an intellectual property conference in Bangalore to honour Hitesh Barot, featuring sessions on innovation and a moot court competition on patent law. The event brought together leading IP professionals to discuss current issues and best practices in Indian intellectual property.

Patent: Basics of Specification Drafting – Presentation by Somashekar Ramakrishna

[slideshare id=45409802&doc=basicsofspecificationdrafting-150304014411-conversion-gate01] The presentation herein, on Basics of Specification Drafting, was delivered by Mr. Somashekar Ramakrishna at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, for...

Presentation on Patent Infringement Analysis by Dr. Kalyan

[slideshare id=45407242&doc=patentinfringementanalysis-150304000311-conversion-gate01] The presentation herein, on patent infringement analysis, is delivered by Dr. Kalyan Kankanala at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, for...

Is Criteria to Determine Obviousness in Patent Still Ambiguous?

The post discusses the persistent ambiguity in the legal criteria for determining obviousness in patent matters. It assesses recent judicial trends and the impact of landmark cases like KSR v Teleflex, noting the continued subjectivity in evaluating inventive step in India.

Special 301 Report: Chapter V. Inventive Step & 3(d) – Comprehending Apprehension or Apprehending Comprehension?

This post critically examines whether Section 3d serves as an extension of the inventive step analysis or as a separate requirement under Indian patent law. It discusses the legal and judicial perspectives on TRIPs compliance and the nuanced challenges in pharmaceutical patentability.

Patent Opposition and Revocation: A Presentation

This post examines patent opposition and revocation procedures under Indian law, including pre-grant and post-grant processes. It analyses legal grounds and roles of authorities involved, providing insights through a structured legal perspective.

Working of the Patent Process: A Presentation

This post objectively examines the patent process in India, covering filing, examination, and grant procedures with an emphasis on compliance and deadlines. It serves as a concise guide to the lifecycle of patents under Indian law.