This post covers the intricate legal analysis of Ericsson’s patents essential for 3G and EDGE standards, dissecting novelty and inventive step aspects. Delve into the court’s scrutiny of prior art arguments and its decision on each patent’s validity.
Read more about Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IXTag: ericsson
A Deep Dive into Section 3(k) Analysis of Ericsson’s Eight Patents – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part VII
This post analyzes an Indian court case between Ericsson and Lava focusing on Section 3(k) of the Patents Act. This section prohibits patents on mathematical methods, business methods, computer programs, and algorithms. The court evaluated the patentability of eight patents related to mobile communication technologies under Section 3(k).
Read more about A Deep Dive into Section 3(k) Analysis of Ericsson’s Eight Patents – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part VIIRevocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VI
The Delhi High Court dismissed Lava’s attempt to revoke Ericsson’s patents based on alleged misrepresentation. The Court highlighted the high burden of proof needed and found Lava to have failed to demonstrate intentional deceit by Ericsson.
Read more about Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VILatest Updates on E-Commerce and Licensing – October 2021- Part I
This is a rundown of last week’s news updates on E-Commerce and Licensing E-commerce standards must balance the interests of all the stakeholders The rules...
Read more about Latest Updates on E-Commerce and Licensing – October 2021- Part IFrom China with Love: The Xiaomi Story
This post was first published on December 19, 2014. Just a few months ago, this particular cellular company took the market by storm and made...
Read more about From China with Love: The Xiaomi StoryDelhi High Court finds CCI Competent
The Delhi High Court has upheld the CCI’s authority to investigate anti-competitive conduct in patent royalty cases, ruling that such matters are not restricted to the Patents Act. The judgment clarifies CCI’s role in addressing abuse of dominant position in the Indian legal context.
Read more about Delhi High Court finds CCI CompetentStandard Essential Patents : Fair? Reasonable? Non-Discriminatory? (I)
This article provides an in-depth analysis of standard essential patents and FRAND litigation in India, focusing on major cases involving Ericsson. It explores the interplay between SSOs, patent holders, and regulatory bodies, and examines the legal challenges surrounding SEP licensing practices.
Read more about Standard Essential Patents : Fair? Reasonable? Non-Discriminatory? (I)Ericsson has a (i)Ball at the Court
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Ericsson against iBall in a significant patent infringement dispute involving standard essential patents for mobile technologies. The court found in favour of Ericsson, stressing the importance of prompt patent rights enforcement in India.
Read more about Ericsson has a (i)Ball at the CourtXiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customers
Xiaomi faces a patent dispute in India but continues to offer competitively priced smartphones. The company leverages its agreements with Qualcomm and focuses on risk mitigation while maintaining its commitment to Indian customers.
Read more about Xiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customersOngoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : Xiaomi
Xiaomi’s patent dispute in India with Ericsson led to a temporary sales ban, but Qualcomm-powered devices can still be sold. The company assures that ongoing legal challenges will not affect the pricing of its smartphones in India. Xiaomi remains committed to launching competitively priced products while enhancing its risk management strategies.
Read more about Ongoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : Xiaomi