The Delhi High Court’s decision in Ericsson vs Lava addresses sufficiency of disclosure under the Patents Act. The Court found Ericsson’s patents to be sufficiently disclosed, rejecting Lava’s revocation claims.
Read more about Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part XTag: ericsson
Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IX
The Delhi High Court’s analysis in Ericsson vs. Lava addresses the novelty and inventive step of key standard essential patents for 3G and EDGE technology. This post summarises the court’s findings on the technical advancements and legal standards applied in evaluating Ericsson’s patents, maintaining a clear and factual legal perspective.
Read more about Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IXStandard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1
The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Ericsson vs. Lava clarifies major legal standards for standard essential patents, FRAND royalties, and infringement in India. This case note examines the Court’s findings on patent validity, damages, and licensing practices in the telecom sector.
Read more about Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1From China with Love: The Xiaomi Story
This post discusses Xiaomi’s rapid growth in the smartphone industry and its legal dispute with Ericsson over standard essential patents in India. The Delhi High Court’s injunction and subsequent partial relief are analysed, providing insights into the legal and market impact for Xiaomi and its rivals.
Read more about From China with Love: The Xiaomi StoryDelhi High Court finds CCI Competent
The Delhi High Court has upheld the CCI’s authority to investigate anti-competitive conduct in patent royalty cases, ruling that such matters are not restricted to the Patents Act. The judgment clarifies CCI’s role in addressing abuse of dominant position in the Indian legal context.
Read more about Delhi High Court finds CCI CompetentStandard Essential Patents : Fair? Reasonable? Non-Discriminatory? (I)
This article provides an in-depth analysis of standard essential patents and FRAND litigation in India, focusing on major cases involving Ericsson. It explores the interplay between SSOs, patent holders, and regulatory bodies, and examines the legal challenges surrounding SEP licensing practices.
Read more about Standard Essential Patents : Fair? Reasonable? Non-Discriminatory? (I)Ericsson has a (i)Ball at the Court
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Ericsson against iBall in a significant patent infringement dispute involving standard essential patents for mobile technologies. The court found in favour of Ericsson, stressing the importance of prompt patent rights enforcement in India.
Read more about Ericsson has a (i)Ball at the CourtXiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customers
Xiaomi faces a patent dispute in India but continues to offer competitively priced smartphones. The company leverages its agreements with Qualcomm and focuses on risk mitigation while maintaining its commitment to Indian customers.
Read more about Xiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customersOngoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : Xiaomi
Xiaomi’s patent dispute in India with Ericsson led to a temporary sales ban, but Qualcomm-powered devices can still be sold. The company assures that ongoing legal challenges will not affect the pricing of its smartphones in India. Xiaomi remains committed to launching competitively priced products while enhancing its risk management strategies.
Read more about Ongoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : Xiaomi