Harley Davidson’s Sound Mark, Kamdhenu mark, Trademark Registration tips and more.

This article explores key trademark law updates, including Harley Davidson’s sound mark issue and Kamdhenu mark litigation. It provides statistical insights, international trends, and practical advice for trademark registration, reflecting recent legal developments in India.

Read more about Harley Davidson’s Sound Mark, Kamdhenu mark, Trademark Registration tips and more.

Clinic plus v. Head & Shoulders, Comparative advertising, Trump Trademarks, INTA study on counterfeit products and piracy & more

This update reviews major trademark law developments in India, including recent court judgments and trends in comparative advertising. It also provides insights into Trump-related trademark filings, the INTA study on counterfeiting, and international trademark law changes.

Read more about Clinic plus v. Head & Shoulders, Comparative advertising, Trump Trademarks, INTA study on counterfeit products and piracy & more

Delhi High Court dismisses Sun Pharma’s plea against Mylan; Nilambur Teak to get GI tag? and much more.

The update discusses the Delhi High Court’s decision in Sun Pharma’s trademark case against Mylan and the potential GI tag for Nilambur Teak. It also covers trademark office initiatives, major trademark acquisitions, and international developments in the field of intellectual property.

Read more about Delhi High Court dismisses Sun Pharma’s plea against Mylan; Nilambur Teak to get GI tag? and much more.

Apple sues Qualcomm again, Major Setback to Bayer, Delhi HC allows export of patented drug and much more.

This update highlights key events in intellectual property law, including Apple’s lawsuit against Qualcomm and Bayer’s loss in the Delhi High Court. Further, it discusses recent trademark and patent disputes as well as upcoming conferences, offering an objective legal perspective.

Read more about Apple sues Qualcomm again, Major Setback to Bayer, Delhi HC allows export of patented drug and much more.

Indian Performing Right Society v. Aditya Pandey & Ors.

This post analyses the Supreme Court’s decision in Indian Performing Right Society v. Aditya Pandey, clarifying royalty payments for sound recordings. The judgment affirms that broadcasters need only pay royalties to the sound recording’s copyright owner, not to the authors of underlying musical or lyrical works.

Read more about Indian Performing Right Society v. Aditya Pandey & Ors.