CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment clarifies evidentiary requirements, parties’ rights regarding Opposition Board reports, and the strict timelines under the Patents Act and Rules.

Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

The Delhi High Court has provided clear procedural guidance for patent opposition proceedings, focusing on transparency and fair opportunity for all parties. The judgment underscores the importance of timely decisions on claim amendments and systematic handling of pre-grant oppositions by the Indian Patent Office.

Read more about Delhi High Court asks the Patent Office to decide on amendments and give adequate opportunity in Opposition Proceedings

CASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India

This case brief discusses the Delhi High Court’s decision in European Commission vs Union of India regarding the restoration of patent applications deemed abandoned due to procedural lapses. The judgment underscores the importance of judicial discretion in exceptional circumstances under Indian patent law.

Read more about CASE BRIEF : European Commission vs. Union of India

High Court remands Patent Office’s Legally Infirm and Unreasoned Order

The Delhi High Court remanded a Patent Office order in a patent grant case for being legally infirm and unreasoned. The judgment underscores the importance of detailed reasoning and adherence to the principles of natural justice in patent proceedings.

Read more about High Court remands Patent Office’s Legally Infirm and Unreasoned Order