The Delhi High Court ruled that selling ghee under the mark NOVYA constitutes passing off and infringement of the registered NOVA trademark. The Court’s decision imposed a permanent injunction and penalty on the Defendant for contempt, highlighting the importance of trademark protection in the dairy sector.
Read more about Use of mark “NOVYA” for selling ‘Ghee’ amounts to passing off and infringement of the mark “NOVA”Tag: Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court issues injunction against Software Piracy
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining unauthorised use of Bentley Systems’ software, addressing copyright infringement claims. The order underscores the protection of international software copyrights in India and the legal approach to software piracy.
Read more about Delhi High Court issues injunction against Software PiracyObjections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguous
The Delhi High Court has reiterated that objections on insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and precise. Procedural lapses by the Indian patent office can undermine the fairness of the patent examination process.
Read more about Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguousCourts Weigh on Inordinate Delay in Patent Orders and Scope of Claim Amendments
The Delhi and Madras High Courts recently set aside patent refusal orders, addressing inordinate delays and the scope of permissible claim amendments. These judgments clarify key patent law principles and reinforce procedural fairness in India.
Read more about Courts Weigh on Inordinate Delay in Patent Orders and Scope of Claim AmendmentsCourt orders Meesho to display Seller Information and comply with Ecommerce Rules
The Delhi High Court has ordered Meesho to display full seller information and comply with ecommerce regulations following a copyright dispute. This decision highlights the responsibility of e-commerce platforms to protect intellectual property and ensure transparency for consumers.
Read more about Court orders Meesho to display Seller Information and comply with Ecommerce RulesTrademark refusal without notice and ‘40’ suffix similarity
Two recent Delhi High Court rulings clarify the consequences of unserved opposition notices and the assessment of trademark similarity based on numeric suffixes. The post analyses both decisions and discusses the procedural challenges in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Trademark refusal without notice and ‘40’ suffix similarityTrademark removal only after notice, and Fly Hi/Timespro Injunctions
This post discusses key Indian trademark cases on removal and injunctions, with courts emphasising notice requirements for removal and granting injunctions against Fly Hi and Timespro infringers. The analysis highlights recent judicial trends in trademark protection.
Read more about Trademark removal only after notice, and Fly Hi/Timespro InjunctionsInteresting Trademark Cases involving ‘Biriyani King’, ‘MI Sumeet’, and ‘Toofan’ Marks
This post examines recent trademark cases from the Delhi, Calcutta, and Madras High Courts, focusing on injunctions and rectification. The analysis underlines the significance of registration and consistent trademark use for legal protection in India.
Read more about Interesting Trademark Cases involving ‘Biriyani King’, ‘MI Sumeet’, and ‘Toofan’ MarksPatanjali for Education, Kenley for Water Bottles, and Head Racer Trade Dress enforcement
This post provides an analytical overview of recent Delhi High Court decisions on trademark and trade dress enforcement. Notable cases include disputes involving Patanjali, Kinley, and Head Racer, reflecting current legal trends in India.
Read more about Patanjali for Education, Kenley for Water Bottles, and Head Racer Trade Dress enforcementOracle’s proprietary word ‘Java’ cannot be used in the domain name and the company name, says the Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has restrained the use of ‘Java’ in domain and company names, citing trademark infringement of Oracle’s rights. The court clarified the scope of permissible use and addressed misleading references to Oracle Certification.
Read more about Oracle’s proprietary word ‘Java’ cannot be used in the domain name and the company name, says the Delhi High Court