The Bombay High Court has restrained the circulation of Ensure Diabetes Care’s advertisement for disparaging Horlicks Diabetes Plus. The ruling addresses the limits of comparative advertising and highlights key principles concerning disparagement and intellectual property rights in India.
Read more about Ensure Diabetes Care’s Advertisement Disparages Horlicks Diabetes Plus, says the Bombay High CourtTag: Comparative Advertising
Trademark Cases: Kalpaka Trademark Republication, Puro Healthy Salt Disparagement, and Tazza Patta Trademark Infringement
This post examines recent Indian trademark cases on republication, disparagement, and deceptive similarity. It discusses judicial reasoning and clarifies important legal standards in trademark law. Readers are encouraged to consult the full judgments for comprehensive understanding.
Read more about Trademark Cases: Kalpaka Trademark Republication, Puro Healthy Salt Disparagement, and Tazza Patta Trademark InfringementPepsodent’s Attaaaack on Colgate Continues
The Delhi High Court declined Colgate’s request for an interim injunction against Pepsodent’s comparative advertisements. The Court analysed trademark, advertising, and competition law, clarifying the legal boundaries of comparative advertising in India.
Read more about Pepsodent’s Attaaaack on Colgate ContinuesComparative Advertising: Pepsodent v. Colgate
The Pepsodent v. Colgate case examines the limits of comparative advertising and disparagement under Indian law. This post offers an objective analysis of legal precedents and the factors courts consider in such disputes.
Read more about Comparative Advertising: Pepsodent v. ColgateTrademark Violations in Comparative Advertising
This post explores the legal aspects of trademark violations in comparative advertising in India. It discusses statutory boundaries, the importance of honest practices, and the risks of defamation or infringement.
Read more about Trademark Violations in Comparative AdvertisingClinic plus v. Head & Shoulders, Comparative advertising, Trump Trademarks, INTA study on counterfeit products and piracy & more
This update reviews major trademark law developments in India, including recent court judgments and trends in comparative advertising. It also provides insights into Trump-related trademark filings, the INTA study on counterfeiting, and international trademark law changes.
Read more about Clinic plus v. Head & Shoulders, Comparative advertising, Trump Trademarks, INTA study on counterfeit products and piracy & moreCan Supreme Court be the pain reliever?
The ongoing dispute between Moov and Zandu Balm raises critical questions about trademark disparagement and comparative advertising law in India. The Supreme Court appeal is set to clarify legal standards for such contentious advertisements.
Read more about Can Supreme Court be the pain reliever?