This post examines recent trademark cases from the Delhi, Calcutta, and Madras High Courts, focusing on injunctions and rectification. The analysis underlines the significance of registration and consistent trademark use for legal protection in India.
Read more about Interesting Trademark Cases involving ‘Biriyani King’, ‘MI Sumeet’, and ‘Toofan’ MarksUse of Music in Salons and Ads
Recent court decisions have strengthened music copyright enforcement against salons and advertisers in India. Businesses are advised to secure licences or use public domain music to comply with legal requirements.
Read more about Use of Music in Salons and AdsMadras High Court allows Appeal under Section 91 with direction to amend word mark to label mark
The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of United Foods’ word mark YOYO, allowing amendment to a label mark under Section 91. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, reflecting a practical judicial approach in trademark appeals.
Read more about Madras High Court allows Appeal under Section 91 with direction to amend word mark to label markPatanjali for Education, Kenley for Water Bottles, and Head Racer Trade Dress enforcement
This post provides an analytical overview of recent Delhi High Court decisions on trademark and trade dress enforcement. Notable cases include disputes involving Patanjali, Kinley, and Head Racer, reflecting current legal trends in India.
Read more about Patanjali for Education, Kenley for Water Bottles, and Head Racer Trade Dress enforcementIs a system for ‘Selectively Displaying Physical Address’ unpatentable as a business method?
The Madras High Court held that a system for selectively concealing physical addresses in e-commerce is not a business method under Section 3k. The decision clarifies the distinction between technological inventions and business method exclusions in Indian patent law.
Read more about Is a system for ‘Selectively Displaying Physical Address’ unpatentable as a business method?Refusal of patent application relating to ‘Soluble Foaming Composition’ set aside
The Madras High Court has overturned the Controller of Patents’ refusal of a soluble foaming composition patent, highlighting procedural lapses in considering applicant submissions. The matter will now be reconsidered by another patent officer within four months.
Read more about Refusal of patent application relating to ‘Soluble Foaming Composition’ set asideMadras High Court provides clarity on Proof of Right, says date of assignment and date of declaration are different.
The Madras High Court clarified the distinction between assignment and declaration dates for proof of right under Section 7(2) of the Patents Act. This ruling guides applicants and controllers on procedural objections in Indian patent applications.
Read more about Madras High Court provides clarity on Proof of Right, says date of assignment and date of declaration are different.Review and Reversal of Patent Refusal Orders by the Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has set aside several patent refusal orders, highlighting the need for proper reasoning and adherence to legal procedures. These judgments clarify essential aspects of patentability assessment and reinforce procedural fairness in Indian patent law.
Read more about Review and Reversal of Patent Refusal Orders by the Madras High CourtChand-z Vs. Chand-A For Lungis: Chand-A trademark is not infringing as the use is honest and concurrent, says the Madras High Court.
The Madras High Court ruled that the Chand-A trademark for lungis is not infringing due to honest and concurrent use. The decision clarifies key principles for establishing such use in trademark disputes.
Read more about Chand-z Vs. Chand-A For Lungis: Chand-A trademark is not infringing as the use is honest and concurrent, says the Madras High Court.Oracle’s proprietary word ‘Java’ cannot be used in the domain name and the company name, says the Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has restrained the use of ‘Java’ in domain and company names, citing trademark infringement of Oracle’s rights. The court clarified the scope of permissible use and addressed misleading references to Oracle Certification.
Read more about Oracle’s proprietary word ‘Java’ cannot be used in the domain name and the company name, says the Delhi High Court