The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction against unidentified defendants for fraudulently using an IP law firm’s trademark and partner’s name. The court’s order addresses trademark infringement, passing off, and cybercrime, while emphasizing the need for vigilance against such deceptive practices.
Read more about Delhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s NameCategory: Trademarks
Wrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set Aside
The Delhi High Court reversed the abandonment of a trademark opposition after it was found the Registrar had served incorrect documents. The order restores the original proceedings, emphasizing procedural fairness in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Wrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set AsidePrakash Pipes prevails over later trademark for ‘Prakash’
The Madras High Court cancelled a later identical trademark registration, upholding Prakash Pipes’ prior rights and extensive use. The Court found the later registration was malicious and reinforced the importance of trademark non-use provisions in India.
Read more about Prakash Pipes prevails over later trademark for ‘Prakash’Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of Himalaya
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to Himalaya in its trademark dispute with Vlado Sky over the “HIMALAYAN ORGANICS” mark. The order cited probable consumer confusion and risk of dilution of Himalaya’s established brand.
Read more about Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of HimalayaOnly Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that only officers with quasi judicial authority may issue binding trademark orders under the Trade Marks Act. Orders passed by unauthorized officials were declared void, setting a significant precedent for the administration of trademark opposition proceedings in India.
Read more about Only Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High CourtThou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says court
The Madras High Court has ruled in favour of Prakash Ferrous Industries, granting them an injunction over the TIRUMALA trademark for TMT steel bars. The judgment reinforces the importance of prior use and documentary proof in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Thou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says courtRebanta Healthcare gets hurt in fight over the mark “REBAHEAL”
The Delhi High Court has issued an interim order restraining Rebanta Healthcare from using the REBAHEAL mark following a trademark infringement suit by Dr. Reddy’s. The court found the marks identical, raising concerns of public confusion and health risks.
Read more about Rebanta Healthcare gets hurt in fight over the mark “REBAHEAL”DISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not Received
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of the DISPOWAY trademark application due to non-receipt of the hearing notice. The case has been remanded for a fresh hearing and correction of the application’s status.
Read more about DISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not ReceivedJumbo Tramples Haathi Trademark Registration
The Calcutta High Court set aside the Registrar’s decision in a trademark dispute involving similar elephant marks for tea products. The court held that the respondent’s mark was deceptively similar to Girnar’s well-known “JUMBO” mark and allowed Girnar’s appeal.
Read more about Jumbo Tramples Haathi Trademark RegistrationIndian IP Office Orders Re-evaluation of Trademark Applications
The Indian IP Office has initiated a re-evaluation of trademark applications handled by QCI-appointed officers. This two-tier review seeks legal compliance and swift resolution, with designated officers and IT support ensuring accountability and efficiency.
Read more about Indian IP Office Orders Re-evaluation of Trademark Applications