How to Encourage Employee Inventors in Your Company to File for More Patents

Discover how Indian companies can encourage employee inventors to file more patents through innovation culture, clear expectations, rewards, and training. These steps enhance both corporate value and employee engagement in intellectual property activities.

Read more about How to Encourage Employee Inventors in Your Company to File for More Patents

Can you revive abandoned/lapsed patents and patent applications in India?

This article explores when and how abandoned or lapsed patents and patent applications may be revived in India, referencing key court decisions. It provides practical legal insights on intent, deadlines, and the scope for extensions under extraordinary circumstances.

Read more about Can you revive abandoned/lapsed patents and patent applications in India?

Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

This post examines how intent now plays a decisive role in reviving lost patents and patent applications in India, following recent Delhi High Court guidance. It outlines when missed deadlines may be remedied and the evidentiary standards required from applicants seeking restoration.

Read more about Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

Why Perform an IP Audit? 5 Reasons

An IP audit enables businesses to identify, classify, and protect their intellectual property assets while assessing associated risks and value. This article outlines the primary reasons for conducting an IP audit and its importance in strategic business planning.

Read more about Why Perform an IP Audit? 5 Reasons

CASE BRIEF: FMC Corporation & Ors. vs. Natco Pharma Limited

The Delhi High Court analysed whether Natco Pharma’s process infringed FMC Corporation’s patented method for producing chlorantraniliprole. The court, relying on expert opinions, found key differences in process steps and chemical agents, leading to a decision of non-infringement.

Read more about CASE BRIEF: FMC Corporation & Ors. vs. Natco Pharma Limited

Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court set aside a Patent Office order rejecting Gogoro Inc’s application for lack of inventive step, citing inadequate reasoning. The case was remanded for proper analysis under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act.

Read more about Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified that divisional applications under the Patents Act must not exceed the scope of the parent application and require plurality of inventions in the original claims. This decision reinforces the primacy of claims in determining the scope of patent protection.

Read more about Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court