Section 3(i) and Diagnostic Patents: Court Upholds Refusal of Prenatal Testing Method

DNA gel bands with a magnifying glass highlighting DNA bases and the word “Disease Featured image for article: Section 3(i) and Diagnostic Patents: Court Upholds Refusal of Prenatal Testing Method

Delhi HC rules Sequenom’s NIPT methods are excluded as “diagnostic” under Section 3(i) and hit by 3(b) for sex selection concerns, while keeping the door open for tools and products.

Read more about Section 3(i) and Diagnostic Patents: Court Upholds Refusal of Prenatal Testing Method

What’s Not Confidential Can’t Be Protected: No Injunction for Disclosed Customer Data

What’s Not Confidential Can’t Be Protected Featured image for article: What’s Not Confidential Can’t Be Protected: No Injunction for Disclosed Customer Data

In the case of Indrex Private Limited vs Suresh Balasubramanian, the Bombay High Court examined whether customer information held by a former employee remained confidential after termination of a cooperation agreement. The plaintiff sought an injunction to restrain use of such information, but the Court declined, finding that the cooperation terms required disclosure and permitted lawful use by the business partner’s successor.

Read more about What’s Not Confidential Can’t Be Protected: No Injunction for Disclosed Customer Data

Personality Rights Infringement via Deepfakes and Digital Misuse

Concept image showing legal balance scales and a gavel symbolizing justice, with a shadowed human figure in the background and a laptop displaying digital media icons and the text 'Safeguarding personality rights in the age of AI and deepfakes'. Featured image for article: Personality Rights Infringement via Deepfakes and Digital Misuse

The Bombay High Court’s decision in Suniel Shetty vs John Doe addresses personality rights infringement caused by deepfakes and digital misuse. The judgement clarifies the scope of legal remedies for celebrities and the obligations of online platforms under Indian law.

Read more about Personality Rights Infringement via Deepfakes and Digital Misuse

Roche’s Appeal Dismissed, Path Open for Affordable Risdiplam in India

Illustration of a medicine bottle labeled “Risdiplam” next to the word “unaffordable,” with a hand using scissors to cut off the “un” prefix, symbolizing making the drug affordable. Featured image for article: Roche’s Appeal Dismissed, Path Open for Affordable Risdiplam in India

The Delhi High Court dismissed Roche’s appeal against Natco Pharma, finding the Risdiplam patent prima facie obvious due to its similarity with prior genus patents, paving the way for affordable generic SMA treatment in India.

Read more about Roche’s Appeal Dismissed, Path Open for Affordable Risdiplam in India

Court Orders Destruction of Counterfeit Tommy Hilfiger Goods

Image of person inspecting watches in a market background, with the texts, 'Original or Fake?' in the left and 'Court Orders Destruction of Counterfeit Tommy Hilfiger Goods' in the right. Featured image for article: Court Orders Destruction of Counterfeit Tommy Hilfiger Goods

The Delhi court granted a permanent injunction against the sale of counterfeit Tommy Hilfiger goods, ordering destruction of seized products. The decision highlights the application of trademark law in protecting brand owners from infringement and counterfeit activities in India.

Read more about Court Orders Destruction of Counterfeit Tommy Hilfiger Goods

Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Fake Videos of Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary

Man wearing a white mask sitting at a desk in front of a computer Featured image for article: Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Fake Videos of Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary

The Delhi High Court has ordered Meta, Google, and others to promptly remove AI-generated fake videos defaming journalist Sudhir Chaudhary. Recognising the urgent harm, the Court mandated swift takedown and preservation of critical data for investigation.

Read more about Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Fake Videos of Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary

Calcutta High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 3(h) in Patent Law: Base SE v. Controller of Patents

Silhouette of a farmer spraying crops with pesticides on one side and a tractor on the other, with rows of crop plants in between, set against a green background. Featured image for article: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 3(h) in Patent Law: Base SE v. Controller of Patents

In Base SE v. Deputy Controller of Patents, the Calcutta High Court ruled that scientific and technical inventions addressing agricultural problems are not excluded under Section 3(h). It also clarified that partial grant of patent claims is not permitted under Indian patent law.

Read more about Calcutta High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 3(h) in Patent Law: Base SE v. Controller of Patents

Saint-Gobain Patent Rejection: Delhi HC Finds No Inventive Step in Glass Coating Claim

Illustration of a judge holding a gavel beside broken glass shards, with the text "Delhi High Court Rejects Saint-Gobain's Patent Application on Glass Coatings Due to Lack of Inventive Step" on a pastel gradient background. Featured image for article: Saint-Gobain Patent Rejection: Delhi HC Finds No Inventive Step in Glass Coating Claim

Delhi HC upholds Saint-Gobain patent rejection, ruling that the glass coating claim lacked inventive step and failed to show technical advancement.

Read more about Saint-Gobain Patent Rejection: Delhi HC Finds No Inventive Step in Glass Coating Claim