Intellectual Property | Intellepedia

People’s Pulse on Intellectual Property and What It Means for Business Today

Featured image showing a stylised human pulse graphic with the title “People’s Pulse on Intellectual Property and What It Means for Business Today,” symbolising public perception of intellectual property and business.

The WIPO Pulse Report released recently reveals that people associate intellectual property with trust and authenticity, even as they question value and access in some regions. These shifting perceptions reflect diverse regional experiences rather than a single global pattern.

Carnatic Karma: Bengaluru Restaurant Barred from Using ‘Carnatic’ Mark

A lively, illustrated street scene with several small cafés and people dining outdoors

The Delhi Commercial Court ruled in favour of Carnatic Café in a trademark dispute with a Bengaluru restaurant using “CARNATIC.” The Court found clear infringement and upheld the plaintiff’s exclusive rights, awarding damages and making the injunction permanent.

FMC Corporation’s Plea to Block Natco’s Cyantraniliprole Insecticide Formulation Denied

Chemical formula backdrop with text Natco wins dispute over Cyantraniliprole intermediate patent

Delhi High Court refused FMC’s interim plea on a Cyantraniliprole intermediate, citing credible invalidity under Sections 64(1)(a) and 64(1)(e) and a tenable Gillette defence. With expiry close, damages suffice rather than an injunction.

Can You Copyright a Product Photo When Design Is Registered? Madras HC Clarifies

A wooden desk with engineering blueprints and technical drawings spread out. Two printed photographs of a pump assembly lie on the blueprints.

The Madras High Court has clarified that a product photograph can be copyrighted even if the product’s design is registered. The Court held that Section 15(1) of the Copyright Act does not bar copyright in a photograph of a registered design, as the two are distinct forms of intellectual property.

Court Clarifies Rules on Confidentiality Clubs and Comparable Licenses in SEP Patent Disputes: Nokia v. Asustek & Ors (2025)

Cartoon banner showing a blond boy holding a finger to his lips in a “shhh” gesture, beside a speech bubble that reads “Shhhhhh..!! It’s Confidential…” on a purple-to-yellow gradient background.

Delhi Hight Court clarifies SEP rules on Confidentiality Clubs and license redactions in Nokia v. Asustek, allowing in-house access without restrictions.

Copyright Ownership in Insolvency: How IP Rights Acquired Through Compromise Prevail Over Legal Heirs

Film studio setup with professional lighting and camera equipment and text stating, 'Copyright ownership in insolvency : unveiling IP rights in dispute'

The Madras High Court confirmed that copyright ownership in insolvency acquired through a court approved compromise takes precedence over claims by legal heirs. The plaintiff was granted a permanent injunction, accounting of profits, and costs, while compensatory damages were denied due to insufficient evidence

Court Allows EMD Millipore’s IR Spectroscopy Patent, Clarifies Scope of Sections 3(i) and 59

Blue DNA banner for article on EMD Millipore v. Controller of Patents interpreting Section 3(i) of the Patents Act.

Delhi HC green-lights EMD Millipore’s IR spectroscopy patent and narrows the sweep of Section 3(i), while affirming compliant claim amendments under Section 59.

Intra-Court Appeals Not Maintainable in Trademark Appeals: Calcutta High Court Interprets Section 100A CPC

In the case of Glorious Investment Limited vs Dunlop International Limited & Anr., the Calcutta High Court ruled that no intra-court appeal lies against an order of a Single Judge made under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act. The court held that once a Single Judge exercises appellate jurisdiction under the Act, a further appeal is barred by Section 100A of the Civil Procedure Code.

Promodome Trademark Dispute: Ex-Parte Injunction Granted

Colourful collage of words and the text 'Promodome Communication Secures Ex-Parte Injunction Against Promodome Digital' in white towards the right

The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte injunction in favour of Promodome Communication Private Limited, restraining the defendant from using identical marks and domain names. The decision highlights the Court’s handling of clear-cut trademark infringement and passing off matters.

Patent Refusal Cannot Be a Single Line: Calcutta High Court Calls for Reasoned Orders

Yellow road marking with bold black text reading “SINGLE LINE. DO NOT CROSS,” symbolizing the lack of reasoning in the Stromag GmbH patent refusal—a single-line decision that violated principles of natural justice.

In the case of Stromag GmbH vs. Controller General of Patents, the Calcutta High Court ruled that patent refusal orders must contain detailed reasoning. A single-line dismissal, the court said, does not meet the legal standards of a quasi-judicial function and is unsustainable.