583 articles
The Delhi High Court's Division Bench held that product-to-claim mapping is indispensable for patent infringement, even in anticipatory suits. In a dispute between Zydus Lifesciences and E.R. Squibb…
When Cartel Bros launched a Sanjay Dutt-endorsed whisky carrying the GODFATHER trademark, Devans Modern Breweries, owner of the mark for 40 years, went to court. The Delhi High…
Daewoong Pharmaceutical challenged the Controller's rejection of its crystalline SGLT inhibitor patent before the Delhi High Court. The core question: does improved dissolution and stability satisfy the Section…
When both Reckitt Benckiser India and Sauss Home Products hold registered "Flying Bird" device marks for cleaning products, infringement claims cancel out, making trademark passing off the only…
In the case of Black Diamond Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai, the Bombay High Court answered a practical question that often arises in trademark…
Philip Morris Products S.A. challenged eight patent refusals at the Delhi High Court, each rejected by the Controller under Section 3(b) of the Patents Act on the ground…
In the case of Qualyst Transporter Solutions LLC v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, the Court dealt with a familiar patent prosecution problem. When a refusal…
The Bombay High Court refused to summarily dismiss patent infringement suits filed by Bharat Bhogilal Patel against TVS Electronics Ltd. and Kalelkar Surgicals Pvt. Ltd., holding that two…
In the case of Novartis AG v. Venkata Narayana Active Ingredients Pvt. Ltd., the Madras High Court dealt with a familiar pharmaceutical patent question in a concrete factual…
When Neurocentria Inc. sought to revive its Indian patent application by disclaiming its earliest PCT priority date - effectively restarting the clock on missed deadlines; the Delhi High…