Author: Dr. Kalyan Kankanala

Dr. Kalyan Kankanala is a practicing intellectual property (IP) attorney and author. He is a senior partner at BananaIP Counsels, a well-known IP firm based in Bangalore, India. His writings cover a range of topics relating to IP law, business, and policy, and he has authored several books and articles in the field. He has been contributing to this blog since 2007. The views expressed here are his own and do not represent those of BananaIP Counsels or its members.

Nuziveedu v. Monsanto – Patentability of Gene Sequences in India (Case Brief and Comments)

This case brief analyses the Nuziveedu v. Monsanto ruling on the patentability of gene sequences in India. The post critiques the Delhi High Court’s reasoning under Section 3j of the Patents Act and highlights issues needing further legal scrutiny.

IP Archive – What Is It And Why It’s Important?

The article outlines the necessity of IP archiving for effective intellectual property protection in today’s digital economy. It highlights how systematic documentation supports ownership, dispute resolution, and ongoing innovation management.

Data Protection in India- Part II

This post evaluates the territorial and personal scope of data protection law in India, addressing jurisdictional issues, extraterritorial application, and compliance challenges. The analysis provides structured responses to key legislative questions, focusing on clarity and factual accuracy.

Disability Patents – Inventions that might make a difference

This article presents a structured overview of Indian disability patents and patent applications developed to address the needs of individuals with different disabilities. Highlighting key inventions, the post provides an analytical perspective on assistive technologies and their impact on inclusivity.

Padmavati and Film Censorship: Fiction is Fact; Fact is Fiction!

The Padmavati controversy brings to light complex issues in film censorship and the certification process in India. This post provides a legal perspective on the balance between creative freedom, historical interpretation, and public sentiment.

Why the Name BananaIP? Why Not?

Dr Kalyan Kankanala shares the story behind the distinctive name BananaIP and its significance for the firm’s identity. The post explores the value of creativity and distinctiveness in intellectual property law.

Privacy and Intellectual Property: Are we trying to kill the snake with a log?

This article examines the Supreme Court’s broad interpretation of the right to privacy and its significant effects on intellectual property law in India. It considers how privacy now influences publicity rights, performer’s rights, and digital data, raising critical questions about future legal and commercial practices.

Copyrights and Jokes: Father Went to Church: ha ha ha

This article provides a structured analysis of how Indian copyright law applies to jokes, covering originality, infringement, and fair dealing. It offers practical insights for creators and users regarding the legal limits and protections for jokes.

Lahari v. Ola: Copyrights and Criminals – Licensing by Deterrence

The Lahari v. Ola dispute demonstrates how copyright owners in India may leverage criminal complaints to initiate licensing deals with organized infringers. This approach, as seen in Lahari’s actions against Ola, combines legal enforcement with strategic publicity to strengthen copyright positions.

Creativity, Illegality and Intellectual Property

This article explores how Indian intellectual property laws address the interplay between creativity and illegality. It analyses the limitations set by patent and copyright law, emphasising the role of morality and legality in the protection of creative works.