Facts (with Timeline): i) FMC Corporation and FMC Agro Singapore Pte. Ltd. (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) were assigned Indian Patent No. 298645 (suit patent/IN’645) titled...
Read more about CASE BRIEF: FMC Corporation & Ors. vs. Natco Pharma LimitedTag: Patent opposition board
CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.
Facts (with Timeline): On 4th October, 2013, Novo Nordisk (hereinafter referred to as “Patentee”) was issued patent IN 257402. On 29th September, 2014, which is five...
Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court has reiterated the principles to be followed with respect to patent oppositions, and has once again explained...
Read more about Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties