Madras High Court Orders Fresh Review of Shaperon’s Skin Disorder Patent Rejection

A woman with a serene expression is shown against a muted green background, with translucent white hexagonal molecular structures superimposed on her face and neck. The image has been used to reflect the theme of this artilce, which is Rejection of Shaperon's patent for skin disorder management Featured image for article: Madras High Court Orders Fresh Review of Shaperon’s Skin Disorder Patent Rejection

The Madras High Court has overturned the rejection of Shaperon Inc’s patent for skin disorder treatment compositions, citing inadequate assessment of prior arguments and international patent approvals. The case has been remanded for fresh consideration by a different officer, with a new decision expected within four months.

Read more about Madras High Court Orders Fresh Review of Shaperon’s Skin Disorder Patent Rejection

Can a Pre-Grant Opposition Survive After Patent Grant?

Text graphic with the phrase “Almost There!” in playful, rounded white font outlined in red, centered on a dark blue background. Featured image for article: Can a Pre-Grant Opposition Survive After Patent Grant?

The Delhi High Court confirmed that once a patent grant order is signed, a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) is no longer valid. This case involving Vertex Pharmaceuticals affirms that the signature date is definitive, regardless of later administrative delays.

Read more about Can a Pre-Grant Opposition Survive After Patent Grant?

SEP, Infringment and principles relating to actual costs – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 5

This post discusses the Delhi High Court’s approach to awarding actual costs in the Ericsson v Lava standard essential patent litigation. It outlines the legal principles applied and analyses the Court’s reasoning, focusing on party conduct and litigation strategy in determining cost awards.

Read more about SEP, Infringment and principles relating to actual costs – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 5

Who Must Pay for Appointment of Scientific Advisors? Vittal Mallya Scientific Research Foundation Vs. Indfrag Limited

The post explores a court’s decision on who must pay for scientific advisors in Indian patent cases, focusing on Section 115 of the Patents Act. It analyses the reasoning behind the judgment and comments on professional conduct during litigation.

Read more about Who Must Pay for Appointment of Scientific Advisors? Vittal Mallya Scientific Research Foundation Vs. Indfrag Limited