Federal Circuit | Intellepedia

Anticipation – Mere Presence of Elements Insufficient; Arrangement of Elements Imperative

This analysis addresses the requirement for both the presence and arrangement of claim elements in anticipation under patent law, drawing from the Net MoneyIN v. Verisign case. The Federal Circuit clarified that combining separate disclosures within a single prior art reference is insufficient to establish anticipation.

Non-obviousness of Biotech Inventions in USA

This post provides an analytical review of non-obviousness standards for biotechnology inventions in the USA, referencing key Federal Circuit decisions. It discusses the evolving judicial approach and inconsistencies in applying patentability requirements to biotech innovations.

Rotec Indus. v. Mitsubishi Gajarsa Corp., 215 F.3d 1246 (Fed. Cir. 2000)

The Rotec v Mitsubishi case examines alleged patent infringement involving a US-patented conveyor system for the Three Gorges Dam project. The Federal Circuit clarified the interpretation of offers to sell and the scope of liability under section 271 of US patent law, ultimately finding no infringement.

State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Sign. Fin. Group Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

This post discusses State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, a pivotal case on the patentability of data processing systems and business methods under US law. The decision clarifies the treatment of mathematical algorithms and business methods in patent eligibility analysis.

Inamed Vs Lubomyr Kuzmak, 249 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2001)

This post reviews the Inamed Vs Lubomyr Kuzmak case, focusing on personal jurisdiction in California for patent disputes. The analysis highlights how minimum contacts and due process requirements were applied in this Federal Circuit decision.

Patenting Software-related Inventions

This post analyses recent US legal decisions shaping software patent eligibility, focusing on the Alice test and key Federal Circuit rulings. It offers practical insights into how software inventions can meet patent requirements under evolving judicial standards.

Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation : A Victory For Software Patents

The Enfish v Microsoft judgment signals a positive shift for software patent eligibility under US law. By recognising a specific technical improvement, the Federal Circuit provided clarity on the abstract idea doctrine and its application to computer-implemented inventions.