The Delhi High Court in Ericsson vs Lava clarified that revocation of a patent on the ground of misrepresentation requires strong, clear evidence of intentional deceit. In this case, Lava failed to meet the legal threshold, resulting in rejection of its revocation claim.
Read more about Revocation of Patent on the ground of misrepresentation – Ericsson vs Lava : Part VITag: BananaIP Counsels
ITC Protects “Gold Flake” Brand: Court Halts Sale of Deceptively Similar Cigarettes
The Delhi High Court has restrained several parties from selling cigarettes using deceptively similar marks to ITC’s Gold Flake brand, citing clear infringement and passing off. This decision underscores the judicial approach to protecting well-known trademarks in India.
Read more about ITC Protects “Gold Flake” Brand: Court Halts Sale of Deceptively Similar CigarettesNo more ‘Social’izing for Social chai
The Delhi High Court has restrained Social Chai from using the “SOCIAL” mark, finding trademark infringement and a likelihood of consumer confusion. The dispute highlights the importance of trademark protection in the restaurant industry.
Read more about No more ‘Social’izing for Social chaiSection 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2
This post analyses the Delhi High Court’s interpretation of Section 3(k) in Ericsson vs Lava, focusing on the patentability of algorithms and computer programs in India. It clarifies the assessment criteria for such inventions and the legislative intent behind software patentability.
Read more about Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2Website/Social Media and Accessibility Job Opening at BananaIP
BananaIP Counsels seeks a Digital Engagement and Website Management Specialist for its Bangalore office. The role demands expertise in WordPress, website accessibility, and digital engagement, with a focus on compliance and technical proficiency.
Read more about Website/Social Media and Accessibility Job Opening at BananaIPNo monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an interim injunction plea, holding that the use of the common surname JINDAL cannot be monopolised under trademark law. The court found no infringement or passing off, as the impugned mark was sufficiently distinct.
Read more about No monopoly rights over common surnames such as JINDAL, court dismisses injunction petition.The words ‘KONDRU’ and ‘LOBAN’ are Publici Juris, says the Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that ‘KONDRU’ and ‘LOBAN’ are generic terms and cannot be monopolised as trademarks. The judgment emphasises that such terms, being publici juris, are not eligible for exclusive trademark rights.
Read more about The words ‘KONDRU’ and ‘LOBAN’ are Publici Juris, says the Delhi High CourtDelhi High Court issues injunction against Software Piracy
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining unauthorised use of Bentley Systems’ software, addressing copyright infringement claims. The order underscores the protection of international software copyrights in India and the legal approach to software piracy.
Read more about Delhi High Court issues injunction against Software PiracyWhere can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench
The Delhi High Court has raised an important question about the proper forum for filing trademark rectification petitions in India. The issue centres on whether jurisdiction should be limited to the High Court overseeing the relevant trademark office or extended to any High Court.
Read more about Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger BenchGuidelines on Film Accessibility in India: Comments and Suggestions
The post analyses the draft film accessibility guidelines in India, offering expert legal comments and practical suggestions for improvement. It discusses responsibility allocation, definition clarity, and recommendations to enhance accessibility for persons with disabilities in cinema.
Read more about Guidelines on Film Accessibility in India: Comments and Suggestions