In a recent decision, the Calcutta High Court upheld an appeal filed by BTS Research International Pty Ltd (“BTS”) challenging the rejection by the Assistant...
Read more about Hybrid Cell Inventions: Section 3(j) of the Patents Act Does Not ApplyTag: Section 3(j)
Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention
The Madras High Court remanded Sakata Seed Corporation’s patent application, focusing on the human intervention in biological processes under Section 3(j). The Court found that the Applicant’s arguments regarding human intervention were not sufficiently addressed by the Patent Office, leading to a fresh review of the case.
Read more about Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human interventionLife of a Gene in India
This analysis addresses the uncertain legal landscape for gene patents in India, with a focus on isolated and purified gene sequences. The author calls for clearer guidelines and consistent application of patent law by the Indian Patent Office.
Read more about Life of a Gene in IndiaNuziveedu v. Monsanto – Patentability of Gene Sequences in India (Case Brief and Comments)
This case brief analyses the Nuziveedu v. Monsanto ruling on the patentability of gene sequences in India. The post critiques the Delhi High Court’s reasoning under Section 3j of the Patents Act and highlights issues needing further legal scrutiny.
Read more about Nuziveedu v. Monsanto – Patentability of Gene Sequences in India (Case Brief and Comments)