Unreasoned Post Grant Opposition Decision Set Aside by the Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court set aside a post grant opposition decision in a patent dispute for inadequate reasoning and lack of independent analysis. The matter has been remanded for fresh consideration before a different officer to uphold procedural fairness.

Read more about Unreasoned Post Grant Opposition Decision Set Aside by the Calcutta High Court

CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

The Delhi High Court’s decision in Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India addresses key procedural and substantive aspects of post grant patent opposition in India. The judgment clarifies evidentiary requirements, parties’ rights regarding Opposition Board reports, and the strict timelines under the Patents Act and Rules.

Read more about CASE BRIEF: Novo Nordisk AS vs. Union of India & Ors.

Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties

This post provides an analytical overview of the procedures and legal standards for post-grant patent opposition in India. It examines the Delhi High Court’s guidance on evidence, hearings, and the respective roles of the Patent Office and Opposition Board, underscoring the need for transparency and timely adjudication.

Read more about Post-Grant Patent Opposition, Evidence and Hearings: Role of Patent Office, Opposition Board, and Parties

Post Grant Opposition of Patents in India – Lecture by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala at UPES School of Law

Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala discusses post grant opposition of patents in India, focusing on the legal grounds and procedure under Section 25(2) of the Patent Act. The lecture was delivered as part of the Patent Law and Practice Program at UPES School of Law.

Read more about Post Grant Opposition of Patents in India – Lecture by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala at UPES School of Law