The Madras High Court allowed France Telecom’s writ petition, setting aside the procedural rejection of its patent application examination request. The judgment clarifies the treatment of agent errors under Indian patent law and upholds procedural fairness.
Read more about Madras HC Overrules Procedural Rejection in France Telecom’s Patent CaseTag: Patents Act 1970
Delhi High Court Reverses Patent Office Decision: Honeywell’s Amendments Upheld
The Delhi High Court overturned the Patent Office’s refusal of Honeywell’s patent amendments, holding that the changes were within the scope of the original claims. This ruling affirms the importance of fair and thorough examination of patent applications under Indian law.
Read more about Delhi High Court Reverses Patent Office Decision: Honeywell’s Amendments UpheldSection 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2
This post analyses the Delhi High Court’s interpretation of Section 3(k) in Ericsson vs Lava, focusing on the patentability of algorithms and computer programs in India. It clarifies the assessment criteria for such inventions and the legislative intent behind software patentability.
Read more about Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2Madras High Court provides clarity on Proof of Right, says date of assignment and date of declaration are different.
The Madras High Court clarified the distinction between assignment and declaration dates for proof of right under Section 7(2) of the Patents Act. This ruling guides applicants and controllers on procedural objections in Indian patent applications.
Read more about Madras High Court provides clarity on Proof of Right, says date of assignment and date of declaration are different.Differentiating Patents and Industrial Designs
The article analyses the differences between patents and industrial designs as forms of intellectual property in India. It examines legal definitions, protection criteria, statutory frameworks, and clarifies common misconceptions, providing a structured comparison for better understanding.
Read more about Differentiating Patents and Industrial DesignsThe Indian Patent Office and Secrecy Directions
The post provides an analytical overview of secrecy directions by the Indian Patent Office under the Patents Act, 1970. It explains the process, legal provisions, and implications for patent applicants, especially in the context of national interest and defence.
Read more about The Indian Patent Office and Secrecy DirectionsComputer Related Inventions Examination Guidelines say NO to Software Patents
The February 2016 guidelines clarify that software patents in India are not granted unless connected with novel hardware, in line with section 3k of the Patents Act. These rules provide much-needed clarity for patent applicants and the software industry.
Read more about Computer Related Inventions Examination Guidelines say NO to Software PatentsLee Pharma v. AstraZeneca- An unfinished Patent Story
This post examines the Lee Pharma v. AstraZeneca case on compulsory licensing under Indian patent law. The Controller’s decision sheds light on the standards for proving public need, affordable pricing, and working of patents in India.
Read more about Lee Pharma v. AstraZeneca- An unfinished Patent StoryNew Computer Related Inventions Guidelines
The Indian Patent Office has replaced earlier provisions with new Guidelines for Computer Related Inventions, clarifying patentability criteria under section 3k of the Patents Act. The Guidelines provide definitions and practical examples, offering more clarity and a nuanced approach to software-related patent applications.
Read more about New Computer Related Inventions GuidelinesIntroduction to Pre-grant & Post-grant Oppositions to Patent Applications
This post provides an analytical overview of pre-grant and post-grant opposition provisions in Indian patent law. It explains the procedural and substantive changes introduced by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005.
Read more about Introduction to Pre-grant & Post-grant Oppositions to Patent Applications