This post analyses the legal and industry dynamics of standard essential patents and FRAND licensing in India. It covers key cases, policy challenges, and the complexities of balancing SEP holder and licensee interests in the Indian context.
Read more about Standard-Essential Patents & FRAND licensing in IndiaTag: Patent Litigation
What a Wonderful World!
The article discusses Google and Microsoft’s decision to resolve all pending patent disputes, signalling a shift towards collaboration in the technology sector. This development is analysed within the broader context of global patent litigation trends and their implications for innovation.
Read more about What a Wonderful World!Mylan settles Patent Litigation with Pfizer
Mylan has reached a settlement with Pfizer over patent litigation related to Sildenafil, allowing earlier generic market entry in the US. This agreement is expected to lower drug prices and may signal a trend for further settlements involving Indian pharmaceutical companies.
Read more about Mylan settles Patent Litigation with PfizerIBM sues Priceline and subsidiaries for Patent Infringement
IBM has sued Priceline and its subsidiaries for allegedly infringing five patents related to online technologies. The case underscores IBM’s ongoing efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights and secure licensing revenue.
Read more about IBM sues Priceline and subsidiaries for Patent InfringementXiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customers
Xiaomi faces a patent dispute in India but continues to offer competitively priced smartphones. The company leverages its agreements with Qualcomm and focuses on risk mitigation while maintaining its commitment to Indian customers.
Read more about Xiaomi maintains competitive pricing; Removes onus of Royalties on customersIEEE amends it’s IP policy related to Standard Essential Patents
IEEE has amended its IP policy for Standard Essential Patents, requiring RAND licensing and setting limits on injunctions. The clarified definition of reasonable terms is expected to reduce litigation and encourage fair negotiations in the telecommunications industry.
Read more about IEEE amends it’s IP policy related to Standard Essential PatentsIs Criteria to Determine Obviousness in Patent Still Ambiguous?
The post discusses the persistent ambiguity in the legal criteria for determining obviousness in patent matters. It assesses recent judicial trends and the impact of landmark cases like KSR v Teleflex, noting the continued subjectivity in evaluating inventive step in India.
Read more about Is Criteria to Determine Obviousness in Patent Still Ambiguous?True Position Inc.’s Device Locator Patent Invalidated
The USPTO’s PTAB has invalidated True Position Inc.’s device locator patent 7,783,299 on grounds of anticipation and obviousness based on prior art. Polaris Wireless successfully challenged the patent’s validity, highlighting the significance of robust prior art analysis in US patent law.
Read more about True Position Inc.’s Device Locator Patent InvalidatedOngoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : Xiaomi
Xiaomi’s patent dispute in India with Ericsson led to a temporary sales ban, but Qualcomm-powered devices can still be sold. The company assures that ongoing legal challenges will not affect the pricing of its smartphones in India. Xiaomi remains committed to launching competitively priced products while enhancing its risk management strategies.
Read more about Ongoing patent battle won’t effect pricing : XiaomiWeekly IP Warm-UP!
Weekly IP Warm-UP covers notable intellectual property law updates, including copyright and patent litigation, music industry developments, and trade secrets cases. The post analyses recent legal changes and court decisions with clarity and factual accuracy.
Read more about Weekly IP Warm-UP!