Monthly Roundup: Key IP Cases reported in March 2023

This roundup discusses notable Indian IP cases from March 2023, covering trademark, patent, copyright, consumer, and accessibility law. The post provides objective analysis and key judicial findings on recent legal decisions relevant to IP stakeholders.

Read more about Monthly Roundup: Key IP Cases reported in March 2023

Missed filing a request for examination? court says, condonable under exceptional circumstances.

The Madras High Court held that delays in filing a request for examination can be condoned under exceptional circumstances, particularly when caused by agent errors. This case highlights both the strict nature of Indian patent timelines and the judiciary’s role in allowing limited flexibility.

Read more about Missed filing a request for examination? court says, condonable under exceptional circumstances.

Justice Pratibha Singh clarifies the jurisdiction of High Courts over Patent Revocations and Appeals

Justice Pratibha Singh has clarified the jurisdiction of High Courts regarding patent appeals, revocations, and writ petitions. Her judgment in Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited vs. The Controller of Patents & Ors. provides structured guidance on the appropriate forums for each type of patent proceeding under Indian law.

Read more about Justice Pratibha Singh clarifies the jurisdiction of High Courts over Patent Revocations and Appeals

Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

This post examines how intent now plays a decisive role in reviving lost patents and patent applications in India, following recent Delhi High Court guidance. It outlines when missed deadlines may be remedied and the evidentiary standards required from applicants seeking restoration.

Read more about Role of ‘Intent’ in Reviving lost Patents and Patent Applications in India

Provisional Patent Application Vs. Complete Patent Application

This article examines provisional and complete patent applications, outlining their differences, advantages, and the implications for inventors in India. It offers a clear comparison to help inventors decide which application suits their needs, stressing the importance of complete disclosure for legal protection.

Read more about Provisional Patent Application Vs. Complete Patent Application

Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court set aside a Patent Office order rejecting Gogoro Inc’s application for lack of inventive step, citing inadequate reasoning. The case was remanded for proper analysis under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act.

Read more about Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified that divisional applications under the Patents Act must not exceed the scope of the parent application and require plurality of inventions in the original claims. This decision reinforces the primacy of claims in determining the scope of patent protection.

Read more about Divisional Applications cannot exceed scope of Parent Application: Delhi High Court