The Madras High Court has revoked the refusal of Green Cross’ patent application for a Hepatitis B immunoglobulin agent, citing errors in the Controller’s analysis. The court has remanded the matter to the patent office for a fresh examination, ordering a review of the claims within four months.
Read more about Green Cross Crosses court’s bridge to win appealTag: Madras High Court
Madras HC on Phonetic Similarity: Little Einsteins vs. Little Einsteinz
The Madras High Court ruled in favor of Sebille Educations, asserting that phonetic similarity takes precedence over visual differences in the trademark dispute between “Little Einsteins” and “Little Einsteinz,” emphasizing the importance of protecting established brands from deceptively similar marks.
Read more about Madras HC on Phonetic Similarity: Little Einsteins vs. Little EinsteinzCow dung lamp from Traditional Knowledge fails to light up patentability standards
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a patent for an eco-friendly lamp made from panchagavya and traditional herbal leaves. The court upheld the decision, citing traditional knowledge and lack of inventive step.
Read more about Cow dung lamp from Traditional Knowledge fails to light up patentability standardsCourt balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59
The Madras High Court has set aside the refusal of Hygieia Inc.’s patent application, highlighting the need for proper consideration of amended claims. The court emphasized the importance of interpreting claims in conjunction with their specifications and has directed a re-examination of the application by a different controller within six months.
Read more about Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59“Focus on technology, not semantics” says court in case involving gene technology
Featured image for “Focus on technology, not semantics” says court in case involving gene technology
The Madras High Court ruled in favor of Toyota, overturning the patent office’s refusal to grant a patent for a gene increasing plant biomass and seed production. The court emphasized the importance of scientific aspects over language semantics and directed a review within six months.
Read more about “Focus on technology, not semantics” says court in case involving gene technologyCourt Cranks the Clock Back on Opposed Crankshaft Patent Refusal
The Madras High Court remanded Pinnacle Engines Inc.’s patent application for their opposed piston engine, addressing inventive features overlooked by the Assistant Controller of Patents. The court emphasized the significance of the crank offset and opposite crankshaft rotation in reducing friction and vibration, directing a reassessment by a different officer.
Read more about Court Cranks the Clock Back on Opposed Crankshaft Patent Refusal‘Controller under an obligation to inform inventor’ says Madras High Court
This post examines two crucial orders from the Madras High Court regarding patent refusals, highlighting the necessity for Controllers to provide detailed and well-reasoned orders. The cases of Nihon Onkyo Engineering Co. Ltd. and Qualcomm Incorporated demonstrate the importance of clarity in refusal decisions to facilitate judicial review and ensure transparency.
Read more about ‘Controller under an obligation to inform inventor’ says Madras High CourtMRF’s Trademark Muscle Secures Victory in Dispute Against Powermax
The Madras High Court ruled in favor of MRF Limited in a trademark and copyright infringement case against Powermax Rubber Factory and Powermax Tyre, granting a permanent injunction and awarding nominal damages. The court found Powermax’s use of similar logos likely to cause consumer confusion and mislead the public.
Read more about MRF’s Trademark Muscle Secures Victory in Dispute Against PowermaxCourt Lifts injunction on Tractor-Forklift Design
The Madras High Court deliberated on whether a tractor fitted with a forklift can be considered a new vehicle and thus be eligible for design registration. The Court’s analysis focused on the novelty and innovation of the design, ultimately determining that such a combination was not new or original, leading to the vacation of an earlier injunction.
Read more about Court Lifts injunction on Tractor-Forklift DesignVictory for Novozymes: Madras High Court Overrules Patent Office’s Refusal
The Madras High Court, in a decision dated March 19, 2024, set aside a patent refusal order issued by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in the case of a patent application filed by Novozymes A/S. This post summarizes the decision of the court in this case.
Read more about Victory for Novozymes: Madras High Court Overrules Patent Office’s Refusal