“Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court ruled that cryptic and uncommunicated orders by the Registrar of Trade Marks violate procedural fairness. The court mandated a fresh review of the trademark application, reinforcing the importance of reasoned decisions in quasi judicial processes.

Read more about “Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court

High Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issues

The Delhi High Court permitted delayed filing of trademark opposition evidence due to e-portal upload limits, clarifying statutory timelines under trademark rules. This case illustrates how technical challenges in e-filing are addressed by the judiciary to ensure procedural fairness in trademark proceedings.

Read more about High Court permits delayed trademark evidence because of E-portal upload issues

The Immaculate Trade Mark Office and the Mystery of the Abandoned TM Applications

The post investigates the procedural issues surrounding the recent mass abandonment of trademark applications in India. It explores legal concerns about notification, evidence, and the Trade Mark Office’s reliance on system-generated orders.

Read more about The Immaculate Trade Mark Office and the Mystery of the Abandoned TM Applications