The Calcutta High Court set aside the Registrar’s decision in a trademark dispute involving similar elephant marks for tea products. The court held that the respondent’s mark was deceptively similar to Girnar’s well-known “JUMBO” mark and allowed Girnar’s appeal.
Read more about Jumbo Tramples Haathi Trademark RegistrationTag: case law analysis
Recap 2021 – Indian Design Case Laws
This post examines significant 2021 judgments on Indian design law, focusing on design registration, infringement, and interim relief. Analytical case summaries highlight the evolving standards applied by Indian courts.
Read more about Recap 2021 – Indian Design Case LawsLikelihood of Confusion: Numerals as Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court recently considered whether different numeral trademarks can be deceptively similar, focusing on the marks ‘1001’ and ‘6004’ in a paint industry dispute. The decision clarifies that use of different numerals as trade marks does not automatically lead to infringement without deceptive similarity.
Read more about Likelihood of Confusion: Numerals as Trade MarksWell Knownness of a Trademark – Part II – Popularity among Substantial Segment of Public
The post analyses the legal benchmarks for establishing a trademark as well known, emphasizing the necessity of recognition among a substantial segment of relevant consumers. It discusses case law and evidentiary standards required to demonstrate such reputation in Indian trademark law.
Read more about Well Knownness of a Trademark – Part II – Popularity among Substantial Segment of Public