Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

A joyful young man holding a jar of Nutella with a spoon in mid-air, surrounded by swirling ribbons of chocolate in a dreamy, artistic background. Featured image for article: Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

Delhi HC grants Ferrero ₹30 lakh in damages, declaring ‘NUTELLA’ a well-known trademark in a major counterfeit case against M.B. Enterprises.

Read more about Sweet victory and Sweeter rewards – court declares NUTELLA well-known Trademark

ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

Cartoon depiction of a boxing match between two juice box characters representing "ORSL" (blue) and "ERSI" (orange), symbolizing a trademark dispute. Both cartons wear boxing gloves and shoes, standing in a ring with splashes of juice and torn labels around, reflecting a legal battle over brand similarity. Featured image for article: ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

Delhi HC awards Rs. 1.21 cr to J&J in the ORSL trademark case against ERSI & ElectroORS for deceptive similarity and injunction violations.

Read more about ORSL vs ERSI: Delhi Court’s Juicy ruling in Johnson & Johnson ORSL Trademark Infringement Case

PAAKASHALA Brand Wins Trademark Injunction: Karnataka HC Rules Against Descriptive Use Defense

An artistic and colorful image of various fruits, vegetables, and food items flying or exploding outward from the center. The composition includes items like tomatoes, bell peppers, onions, broccoli, pineapple, bread rolls, and leafy greens, all suspended mid-air. There are also stylized humanoid food figures interacting with the scene, creating a lively and surreal food battle effect against a bright background. Featured image for article: PAAKASHALA Brand Wins Trademark Injunction: Karnataka HC Rules Against Descriptive Use Defense

In a dispute over the restaurant brand PAAKASHALA, the Karnataka High Court restrained a Mysuru outlet from using a similar name. The Court found that the plaintiff, a registered trademark owner, had made out a prima facie case of infringement.

Read more about PAAKASHALA Brand Wins Trademark Injunction: Karnataka HC Rules Against Descriptive Use Defense

Technical Delay Cannot Lead to Trademark Opposition Abandonment

Image accompanying blog post on "Technical Delay Cannot Lead to Trademark Opposition Abandonment." Featured image for article: Technical Delay Cannot Lead to Trademark Opposition Abandonment

The Delhi High Court held that procedural lapses, such as failing to file an original affidavit on time, cannot justify abandonment of trademark opposition if there is clear intent to comply. The judgment underscores the primacy of substantive rights over minor technicalities in Indian trademark law.

Read more about Technical Delay Cannot Lead to Trademark Opposition Abandonment

Horizontal to Vertical inversion of letters not a ‘substantial amendment’ of trademark

Image accompanying blogpost on "Horizontal to Vertical inversion of letters not a ‘substantial amendment' of trademark" Featured image for article: Horizontal to Vertical inversion of letters not a ‘substantial amendment’ of trademark

Delhi High Court sets aside Registrar’s cancellation of a trademark, ruling that vertical inversion of letters is not a substantial amendment under trademark law.

Read more about Horizontal to Vertical inversion of letters not a ‘substantial amendment’ of trademark

Dunlop Trademark Dispute: Eight Opposed Registrations Set Aside by Calcutta High Court

Image showing Industrial factory setting with conveyor belts and workers handling tyres and materials, overlaid with the text 'Dunlop Trademark Dispute' and gavel icons, symbolising a legal dispute over trademark rights. Featured image for article: Dunlop Trademark Dispute: Eight Opposed Registrations Set Aside by Calcutta High Court

In a series of eight appeals concerning trademark oppositions filed by Dunlop International Limited against Glorious Investment Limited, the Calcutta High Court set aside orders passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing Glorious Investment to register the mark “DUNLOP” in various classes. The Court held that the Registrar’s decisions were procedurally flawed, unreasoned, and passed in violation of natural justice.

Read more about Dunlop Trademark Dispute: Eight Opposed Registrations Set Aside by Calcutta High Court

Epifi Outspeeds F1 Trademark in Court – No Use, No Rights!

Two cars racing side-by-side toward a checkered finish line with a waving finish flag; one car with FI MONEY written on it leads as it speed past the car with F1 on it. Featured image for article: Epifi Outspeeds F1 Trademark in Court – No Use, No Rights!

The Delhi High Court cancelled the F1 trademark held by Formula One in Class 36 for non-use in India, following Epifi’s rectification petition. The decision reaffirms that trademark rights require genuine and ongoing use.

Read more about Epifi Outspeeds F1 Trademark in Court – No Use, No Rights!

‘Parliament’ Isn’t Just for Politicians

Illustration of the Indian Parliament building with the national flag atop, captured during golden hour. A 'TRADEMARK' stamp is superimposed on the right side of the image, symbolising legal or intellectual property context. Featured image for article: ‘Parliament’ Isn’t Just for Politicians

The Delhi High Court has clarified that the use of “Parliament” as a trademark does not violate the Emblems and Names Act if used as a common noun. This ruling enables businesses to use such terms in branding, as long as they don’t imply a direct association with governmental institutions.

Read more about ‘Parliament’ Isn’t Just for Politicians