Patent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrack

Patent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrack Featured image for Patent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrack

The Delhi High Court confirmed the refusal of Mahesh Gupta’s patent application for a Portable Vehicle Management System, citing the lack of an inventive step in light of prior arts D4 and D5. The decision underscores important principles of patentability, including mosaicing, hindsight bias, and the criteria for non-obviousness.

Read more about Patent on Portable Vehicle Management System goes offtrack

Could an advanced Chat GPT be ‘the person skilled in the art’ for patent prosecution?

Could an advanced Chat GPT be ‘the person skilled in the art’ for patent prosecution? Featured image for Could an advanced Chat GPT be ‘the person skilled in the art’ for patent prosecution?

This post gives a general overview on the possibilities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models such as ChatGPT, in providing useful assistance in the Patent examination process.

Read more about Could an advanced Chat GPT be ‘the person skilled in the art’ for patent prosecution?

Special 301 Report: Chapter V. Inventive Step & 3(d) – Comprehending Apprehension or Apprehending Comprehension?

Special 301 Report: Chapter V. Inventive Step & 3(d) – Comprehending Apprehension or Apprehending Comprehension? Featured image for Special 301 Report: Chapter V. Inventive Step & 3(d) – Comprehending Apprehension or Apprehending Comprehension?

Is Section 3(d) an extension of the Inventive Step analysis? The answer to this question can make a difference to the compliance of non-discrimination obligations...

Read more about Special 301 Report: Chapter V. Inventive Step & 3(d) – Comprehending Apprehension or Apprehending Comprehension?