BananaIP Counsels Logo

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Image accompanying blogpost on " Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court"

Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court

In this case, the Delhi High Court explored if a trademark opposition be ‘deemed as abandoned’ if there was a delay in service of evidence by the opponent in the opposition. The Court also explained whether the timelines mentioned in the Trade Marks Act and Rules are mandatory or not. Continue Reading Trademark opposition timelines are mandatory, and must be complied strictly, says the Delhi High Court
February 13, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 377Views 0Like
Share

Read more

Blog Featurette Image

Youtuber Held Liable for Unauthorized Use of Trademarks: Dabur India Limited v. Dhruv Rathee and Ors.

The petitioner, Dabur, who is the manufacturer of beverages under the name “Real”, is alleging that a Youtuber named Dhruv Rathee published a video tarnishing the petitioner’s brand reputation. The video also depicted an earlier advertisement aired, as well as a distorted image of the petitioner’s product Real, which infringes upon its trademark and copyright rights. The Calcutta High Court held that the acts of the respondent infringed upon the petitioner’s rights under section 29 (9) of the Trade Marks…
March 27, 2023 Case Study, Copyrights, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1196Views 0Like
Share

Read more