{"id":83648,"date":"2021-09-22T11:30:46","date_gmt":"2021-09-22T06:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=83648"},"modified":"2025-07-02T17:12:01","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T11:42:01","slug":"weekly-trademark-office-statistics-september-2021-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/weekly-trademark-office-statistics-september-2021-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Weekly Trademark Office Statistics – September, 2021 – Part IV"},"content":{"rendered":"

This weekly Trademark Office data has been compiled from dynamic data published by the Trademark Office as updated till 22nd September, 2021. These statistics are presented to you by the Trademark and Copyright team of BananaIP Counsels, India\u2019s leading Intellectual Property Firm.<\/p>\n

Indian Trademark Statistics<\/h2>\n

An increase of five percent (5%) in the total number of trademark applications examined by the Trademark Office this week. A total of five thousand three hundred and ninety-four (5394) applications were examined. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the Trademark Office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n

Trademark Registry Floats a Bubble<\/h2>\n

The Trademark Registry has displayed a bump in its working capacity during the past week. There has been an increase of fourteen percent (14%) in the total applications disposed through show cause hearings. There has also been an increase of five hundred and twenty nine percent (529%) in the total number of hearing notices issued. However, five thousand six hundred and eighty-seven (5687) applications were published in the previous week, exhibiting a ten percent (10%) decrease in publications since last week. Additionally, two thousand three hundred and eighty-seven (2387) registration certificates were issued, and two thousand nine hundred and twenty-five (2925) renewal notices were issued.<\/p>\n

Weekly Indian Trademark Office Statistics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
List of Cities<\/th>1st of January till date<\/th>17th September 2021 to 24th September 2021<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Delhi<\/td>1,159\t<\/td>26<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mumbai<\/td>860<\/td>37<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pune<\/td>673<\/td>10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bangalore<\/td>973<\/td>24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Chennai<\/td>1,091\t<\/td>13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hyderabad<\/td>608<\/td>16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kolkata<\/td>225<\/td>5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Statistics per Trademark Office<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Total early publications<\/th>8,002<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Total ordinary publications<\/td>26,925<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total applications published<\/td>34,927<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total grants in Delhi<\/td>8,470<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total grants in Mumbai<\/td>3,516<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total grants in Chennai<\/td>8,020<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total grants in Kolkata<\/td>3,370<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Grants<\/td>23,376<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total applications examined<\/td>53,423<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Trademark Office Statistics Compiled till 22nd September, 2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\t\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

Data compiled by Lavanya Anand, Varun Gopala Krishnan and Rohan Joshua Jacob of the Trademark, Copyright and IP Transactional Strategy Division, BananaIP Counsels.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
If you have any questions, or need any clarifications, please feel free to write to contact@bananaip.com<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Disclaimer: Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to contact@bananaip.com for corrections and take down.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This week\u2019s analysis covers Indian Trademark Office statistics as compiled by BananaIP Counsels up to 22nd September 2021. The post examines trends in application examinations, hearings, publications, registrations, and renewals, offering a structured view of the latest registry activities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":10,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[183,2756,1258,2037,10729,10930,10623,3375],"class_list":["post-83648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-bananaip-counsels","tag-indian-trademark-statistics","tag-intellectual-property-india","tag-trademark-applications","tag-trademark-hearings","tag-trademark-office-statistics","tag-trademark-registrations","tag-trademark-registry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83648"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":142200,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83648\/revisions\/142200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n