{"id":75873,"date":"2021-05-20T23:55:35","date_gmt":"2021-05-20T18:25:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=73712"},"modified":"2025-07-01T18:37:22","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T13:07:22","slug":"indian-trademark-applications-statistics-weekly-report-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/indian-trademark-applications-statistics-weekly-report-2\/","title":{"rendered":"5900 New Trademark Applications Filed this Week"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Decrease of 24 percent in total trademark applications examined this week. A total of 9100 trademark registrations granted this week. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the trademark office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The Trademark Registry had a slow week in terms of working capacity as can be seen from the data below. There has been a decrease of twenty four percent (24%) in the total trademark applications disposed through show cause hearings. We can also see a decrease of sixty six percent (66%) in the total number of hearing notices issued. However, there has been a significant increase of fifty-seven (57%) in the total number of applications published in the Trademark Journal.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\"><strong>Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"121\"><strong>Last Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"151\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"167\"><strong>Change in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">6382<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">5183<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">2053<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">1556<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">3975<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">6250<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">An increase of 57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">8732<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">9100<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">An increase of 4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">12369<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">4245<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Renewal Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">4569<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 456900%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Total Number of New Applications Received between May 12<sup>th<\/sup> to May 19<sup>th<\/sup>, 2021<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>\u00a0Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>New Applications<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Examined<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Published<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Registered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">1<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">AHMEDABAD<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">913<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">663<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1034<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1259<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">CHENNAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1228<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1023<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">962<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1790<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">DELHI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">2016<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1996<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2616<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">3461<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">KOLKATA<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">389<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">319<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">439<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">516<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">MUMBAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1356<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1182<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1199<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2074<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>5902<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>5183<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>6250<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>9100<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Trademark Statistics from January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2021 to May 19<sup>th<\/sup>, 2021<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Filed \u2013 <strong>167940<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Examined \u2013 <strong>81920<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Published \u2013 <strong>91058<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Registered \u2013 <strong>163512<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Authored and compiled by Uma T.S, Shreya Chaddha &amp; Varun Gopalakrishnan<\/strong><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>If you have any questions, or need any clarifications, please feel free to write to contact@bananaip.com<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Disclaimer: Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to contact@bananaip.com for corrections and take down.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Indian Trademark Registry experienced notable changes this week, including a decrease in applications examined and hearing notices issued, but a significant rise in published applications. The report offers objective analysis of weekly and yearly trademark statistics across major jurisdictions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":2,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[29,5,6110,3006,2037,1732,2538,10917],"class_list":["post-75873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-india","tag-intellectual-property","tag-legal-news","tag-registration","tag-trademark-applications","tag-trademark-office","tag-trademark-statistics","tag-weekly-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75873"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":141668,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75873\/revisions\/141668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}