{"id":73676,"date":"2021-05-14T15:16:35","date_gmt":"2021-05-14T09:46:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=73676"},"modified":"2025-07-01T18:33:30","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T13:03:30","slug":"indian-trademark-registry-weekly-statistics-report-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/indian-trademark-registry-weekly-statistics-report-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Slow Week at the Trademark Registry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Decrease of 35 percent in the total trademark applications examined this week. Decrease of 9 percent in the total registrations granted this week. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the trademark office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n<h2>INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/h2>\n<p>The Trademark Registry had a slow week in terms of working capacity as can be seen from the data below. There has been a decrease of 35 percent (35%) in the total trademark applications examined. We can also see a decrease of twelve percent (12%) in the total applications disposed through show cause hearing. However, there has been a significant increase of sixty-nine (69%) in the total number of applications published in the Trademark Journal.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\"><strong>Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"121\"><strong>Last Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"151\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"167\"><strong>Change in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">9885<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">6382<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">2309<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">2053<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">2350<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">3975<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">An increase of 69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">9634<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">8732<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">A decrease of 9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">8797<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">12369<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">An increase of 41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"178\">Total Renewal Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"151\">4569<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">An increase of 456900%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Total Number of New Applications Received between May 5<sup>th<\/sup> to May 12<sup>th<\/sup>, 2021<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>\u00a0Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>New Applications<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Examined<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Published<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Registered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">1<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">AHMEDABAD<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">864<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">952<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">614<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1263<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">CHENNAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1627<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1206<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">686<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1898<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">DELHI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1790<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2298<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1731<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">3105<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">KOLKATA<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">455<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">477<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">295<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">434<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">MUMBAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1447<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1449<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">649<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2032<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>6183<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>6382<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>3975<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>8732<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Trademark Statistics from January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2021 to May 12<sup>th<\/sup>, 2021<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Filed \u2013 <strong>162166<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Examined \u2013 <strong>77414<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Published \u2013 <strong>85503<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Registered \u2013 <strong>155062<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Authored and compiled by Uma T.S, Shreya Chaddha &amp; Varun Gopalakrishnan<\/strong><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>If you have any questions, or need any clarifications, please feel free to write to contact@bananaip.com<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Disclaimer: Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to contact@bananaip.com for corrections and take down.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This report provides an analytical overview of the latest Indian trademark statistics, reflecting a significant decrease in examined applications and granted registrations. The data is sourced from the official trademark office journal and presents a factual account of weekly trends.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":3,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[2756,1258,7535,80,10226,1732,105,3375],"class_list":["post-73676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-indian-trademark-statistics","tag-intellectual-property-india","tag-legal-statistics","tag-trademark-application","tag-trademark-journal","tag-trademark-office","tag-trademark-registration","tag-trademark-registry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73676"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73676\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":141661,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73676\/revisions\/141661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}