{"id":70964,"date":"2021-05-02T16:00:59","date_gmt":"2021-05-02T10:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=70964"},"modified":"2025-07-01T18:19:43","modified_gmt":"2025-07-01T12:49:43","slug":"supreme-court-patent-limitation-compulsory-licensing-india-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/supreme-court-patent-limitation-compulsory-licensing-india-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court restores order extending time limits indefinitely, asks why Government is not invoking compulsory licensing provisions and more"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong><em>In this week\u2019s patent news and updates &#8211; <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>Supreme Court restores order extending time limits indefinitely; Supreme Court asks Government why it is not invoking compulsory licensing provisions; <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>US<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> publishes infamous &#8220;Special 301 Report&#8221;, places India on priority watch list; USPTO organizing series of free webinars on Industrial designs \/ design patents<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #ff6600;\"><strong>Indian Patent Updates<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong>Supreme Court restores order extending time limits indefinitely<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court on Tuesday, i.e., April 27<sup>th<\/sup> restored its order from last year <em>In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, <\/em>extending the period(s) of limitation provided under any general or special laws with effect from 14<sup>th<\/sup> March 2021.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The order which was issued last year on 23<sup>rd<\/sup> March 2020, had directed that \u201c<em>the period(s) of limitation, as prescribed under any general or special laws in respect of all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, whether condonable or not, shall stand extended till further order&#8221;. <\/em>This year, on the 8<sup>th<\/sup> of March 2021 however, the Supreme Court had ended the extension of limitation with effect from 14<sup>th<\/sup> of March 2021, citing improved situation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">In view of the of the unprecedented spike in the number of COVID cases and the dire situation prevailing across the country, the Supreme Court in its latest order observed<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">\u201c<em>The extraordinary situation caused by the sudden and second outburst of COVID-19 Virus, thus, requires extraordinary measures to minimize the hardship of litigant\u2013public in all the states. We, therefore, restore the order dated 23rd March, 2020 and in continuation of the order dated 8th March, 2021 direct that the period(s) of limitation, as prescribed under any general or special laws in respect of all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, whether condonable or not, shall stand extended till further orders<\/em>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong>Supreme Court asks Government why it is not invoking compulsory licensing provisions<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The Supreme Court on Friday yet again asked the Central Government as to why it was not considering invoking the provisions of compulsory licensing under the Indian Patent Act in respect of the prevailing situation across the country. The bench consisting of Justices DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhat posed the question Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and sought to know if the Centre was considering \u201cinvoking Section 92 of Patents Act and issue compulsory licenses so that drugs can be manufactured while royalty is sorted\u201d. The Court further directed the government to show cause as to why the Court should not issue orders to invoke Section 92 or Section 100 of the Patents Act to enable manufacture of generic drugs with respect to Remdesivir, Tocilizumab or Favipiravar. Justice Ravindra Bhat reportedly stated that &#8220;This is an exact case where we should go for compulsory licensing. This is a situation of Public Health Emergency&#8221;. The Court has asked to Centre to respond to the points raised by the bench when the matter is brought up again on May 10<sup>th<\/sup>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">It is interesting to note that the Delhi High court had earlier this month on April 20<sup>th<\/sup> directed the Government to \u201cimmediately reach out to the manufacturers\/ patent holders\/ licensees so as to forthwith ramp up the production capacities\u201d of drugs \u201cand all such other medications, as are essential for\u201d use in the treatment and management of COVID patients. The court had further stated that \u201cthe Government\/ Controller should not hesitate to invoke their jurisdiction and powers\u201d under the patent act, as far as issuing of compulsory licenses is concerned.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong>US<\/strong><strong> publishes infamous &#8220;Special 301 Report&#8221;, places India on priority watch list<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The United States on Friday published its latest edition of the &#8220;Special 301 Report&#8221;. The report has placed India and eight other countries on the Priority Watch List for IP protection and enforcement. The eight other countries include Argentina, Chile, China, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine and Venezuela. US Trade Representative Katherine Tai has reportedly stated that \u201cOver the past year, India has remained inconsistent in its progress on intellectual property (IP) protection and enforcement. While India\u2019s enforcement of IP in the online sphere has gradually improved, a lack of concrete benefits for innovators and creators persists, which continues to undermine their efforts. India remains one of the world\u2019s most challenging major economies with respect to protection and enforcement of IP,&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The USTR &#8220;Special 301 Report&#8221; published annually has been dubbed and dismissed as dubious in the past by several experts who say that the report is nothing but a reflection of the personal interests of the US with no regard to IP laws of other countries.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #ff6600;\"><strong>Upcoming patent \/ design webinars<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong>USPTO organizing series of free webinars on Industrial designs \/ design patents <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The USPTO will be organizing a series of webinars on Industrial designs \/ design patents through May and June. Each webinar will cater to a specific sector such as Consumer products and fashion, Healthcare and fitness, Vehicles and Electronics, user interfaces and will involve a panel of design examiners, patent experts, among others. The first webinar for the month will be conducted on May 6<sup>th<\/sup> between 11:00 AM MT and 12:30 PM MT i.e., between 10:30 PM IST and 12:00 AM IST and is aimed at <strong>Consumer products and fashion. <\/strong>More <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-consumer-products-and-fashion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">details<\/a> about the webinar may be accessed on USPTO\u2019s official website, <a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-consumer-products-and-fashion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\">The events are free and would benefit anyone wanting to understand how to leverage design patent strategies in their intellectual property portfolios, both in terms of maximizing portfolio value and success in enforcement.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif; color: #000000;\"><strong>Webinar Series Schedule:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-consumer-products-and-fashion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Design Webinar Series: Consumer products and fashion<\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong> : May 6<sup>th<\/sup> <\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-healthcare-and-fitness\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Design Webinar Series: Healthcare and fitness<\/strong><\/a><\/span><strong> : May 20<sup>th<\/sup> <\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-vehicles\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Design Webinar Series: Vehicles<\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong> : June 10<sup>th<\/sup> <\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/about-us\/events\/design-webinar-series-electronics-and-user-interfaces\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Design Webinar Series: Electronics and user interfaces<\/span><\/strong><\/a><strong> : June 17<sup>th<\/sup> <\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: 'book antiqua', palatino, serif;\"><strong><em>Authored by Gaurav Mishra<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>If you have any questions, or need any clarifications, please feel free to write to contact@bananaip.com<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><b>Disclaimer:<\/b> Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to contact@bananaip.com for corrections and take down.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court has indefinitely extended limitation periods for legal proceedings in view of the COVID-19 situation and questioned the Government&#8217;s approach to compulsory licensing of essential medicines. India also features on the US Special 301 Report&#8217;s Priority Watch List, while the USPTO is hosting free design patent webinars.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":6,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,14],"tags":[499,4129,342,5,50,87,3902,11295],"class_list":["post-70964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-patents","tag-compulsory-licensing-2","tag-covid-19","tag-design-patents","tag-intellectual-property","tag-patent-law","tag-special-301-report","tag-supreme-court-india","tag-uspto-webinars"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70964"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70964\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":141646,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70964\/revisions\/141646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}