{"id":69697,"date":"2020-11-02T16:00:05","date_gmt":"2020-11-02T10:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=69697"},"modified":"2025-06-30T17:29:38","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T11:59:38","slug":"uk-ip-law-changes-indian-designs-wipo-ai-patent-applications-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/uk-ip-law-changes-indian-designs-wipo-ai-patent-applications-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Changes to UK IP Law from 1st January 2021, Indian Designs added to WIPO Global Design Database, AI related patent applications double and more"},"content":{"rendered":"

In this week\u2019s Patent News \u2013 Indian Designs added to WIPO Global Design Database; EPO invalidates Amgen\u2019s patent claims protecting drug – Praluent, rules in favor of Sanofi and Regeneron; TikTok Inc. files suit for declaratory relief against Triller; Jury verdict directs Apple to pay $500 million to VirnetX by way of damages; UK IPO publishes information on the changes to UK intellectual property law from 1st<\/sup> January 2021; USPTO hosts ID5 6th<\/sup> Annual Meeting, commemorates the 5th anniversary of the ID5 forum; SAIP organizes IP20+ Global Intellectual Property Challenges Forum and other news updates.<\/span><\/p>\n

INDIAN DESIGNS NEWS<\/span><\/h2>\n

Indian Designs now added to WIPO Global Design Database<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Indian design (industrial designs) applications have now been added to the WIPO Global Design Database which implies that a person using the WIPO design database will now be able to search and view almost all the design applications filed and registered with the Indian designs office. A basic search indicates that over 59,000 Indian design applications have been added to the database. The WIPO design database may be accessed at https:\/\/www3.wipo.int\/designdb\/en\/\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

PATENT INFRINGEMENT NEWS UPDATES<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

EPO invalidates Amgen\u2019s patent claims protecting drug – Praluent, rules in favor of Sanofi and Regeneron<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

On 29th<\/sup> October, 2020, the\u00a0European Patent Office (EPO) Technical Boards of Appeal invalidated certain patent claims of the European Patent \u2013 EP 2215124, owned by Amgen. The EP patent protects a drug named \u2018Praluent,\u2019 sold in over 60 countries. As reported by Global Newswire, the EPO ruling comes in furtherance to the 2019 ruling by the District Court for the District of Delaware. The District Court of Delaware also ruled in favor of Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals after finding Amgen\u2019s patent claims to be invalid based on lack of enablement. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

TikTok Inc. files suit for declaratory relief against Triller<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0In the month of July 2020, Triller, a popular video sharing platform, had filed a patent infringement suit against TikTok Inc. The lawsuit, filed in the Western District of Texas, was in reference to Triller\u2019s US Patent No. 9,691,429 titled \u201cSystems and methods for creating music videos synchronized with an audio track.\u201d In furtherance to this suit, ByteDance Inc. and TikTok Inc. recently moved the Western District Court of Texas to seek a Declaratory Relief. In its declaratory action plea, TikTok has stated that the infringement allegations are untrue and that it does not infringe the claims of the referenced U.S patent.<\/span><\/p>\n

A declaratory relief refers to a court\u2019s judgement stating the rights of parties without ordering any specific action or awards by way of damages. The plaintiff can seek a remedy thorough the means of a declaratory relief when he is in doubt of the status of his legal rights.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jury verdict directs Apple to pay $500 million to VirnetX by way of damages <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

As per a recent verdict by a Jury in Texas, Apple Inc. has been directed to pay $503 million as damages for infringing a patented technology owned by VirnetX. According to reports, VirnetX argued that the jury was entitled to award $700 million as damages, while Apple counter argued that only $113 million was payable. The jury later settled the royalty rate at 84 cents per unit, amounting to $503 million.<\/span><\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND DESIGNS NEWS UPDATES<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

New report by US PTO indicates 100% increase in number of AI-related patent applications\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

As per a new report published\u00a0by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (US PTO), the number of Artificial Intelligence (AI) related patent applications, received annually, have doubled from 2002 to 2018. The report titled \u2013 \u201cInventing AI: Tracing the diffusion of artificial intelligence with U.S patents,\u201d indicates that the annual AI patent applications have grown from 30,000 in 2002 to more than 60,000 in 2018. The U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, issued a statement saying \u201cI am pleased to see this rapid increase in artificial intelligence patent applications received by the US PTO, as artificial intelligence is becoming an integral part of our everyday lives.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

You may click here<\/a><\/span> to access the full report.<\/span><\/p>\n

UK IPO publishes information on changes to UK intellectual property laws from 1st January 2021<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Govt. of UK on its official website has published \u2018key information\u2019 for customers and users of IP in respect of how the IP system and the Intellectual Property Office will operate after the end of the transition period which ends on the 31st<\/sup> of December 2020. According to the website, from 1st<\/sup> January 2021 there will be changes to UK intellectual property law to ensure the smooth departure from EU IP systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

Summary of key changes to come into effect from 1st<\/sup> January 2021:<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

1. Use of representatives and address requirements to represent<\/em> <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

UK attorneys will be unable to represent clients on new applications or new proceedings at the\u00a0EU\u00a0Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). However, the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) ensures that UK legal representatives can continue to represent their clients before the\u00a0EUIPO\u00a0in cases that are ongoing at the end of the transition period.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Changes to IP rights in respect of Patents, Trademarks, Designs, International Trade Marks and Designs, Unregistered designs, Copyrights and Geographical Indications.<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

With respect to patents, in accordance with the existing patent filing system, applications can be filed with the UK IPO or the European Patent Office\u00a0(EPO) to protect the invention in over 30 countries under the European Patent Convention (EPC). As the EPO is not an EU agency, there will be no changes in process of securing patent rights.<\/span><\/p>\n

In respect of designs, re-registered UK designs will be created by the IPO at the end of the transition period, under the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement. A re-registered design will be created for every Registered Community Design (RCD). No application fee will be applicable. Further, the IPO will not issue a UK registration certificate.<\/span><\/p>\n

International TMs and designs designating the\u00a0EU\u00a0will continue to have protection in the UK under the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement. The IPO will create a re-registered UK design for every international design. Where an applicant has applied for the protection of an International design designating the\u00a0EU and a protection has not been granted, the applicant will have nine months to apply for the same right as a UK design.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. Grant of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs)<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

The Withdrawal Agreement ensures that SPC applications which are pending at the end of the transition period will be examined under the current framework. Any SPC which is granted based on those applications will provide the same protection as existing SPCs<\/span><\/p>\n

To read the detailed information click here<\/a><\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

USPTO hosts ID5 6th<\/sup> Annual Meeting, commemorates the 5th anniversary of the ID5 forum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (US PTO) virtually hosted the 6th edition of the ID5 Annual Meeting on 29th<\/sup> and 30th October 2020. ID5 is the multilateral cooperation forum, consisting of the five largest Design Offices in the world, namely, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The ID5 Forum was inaugurated in 2015 to aid cooperation among members in the field of designs registration. As reported by EUIPO on its official website, ID5 offices\u00a0approved five new initiatives – the \u2018Exchange of New Technologies\u2019 by the EUIPO, \u2018Joint Communication Action\u2019 by the EUIPO and the KIPO, \u2018Deferment of Publication\u2019 by the KIPO and the USPTO, the \u2018ID5 5-Year Review\u2019 and \u2018A Study of Term of Protection\u2019 by the USPTO. The offices have also agreed that CNIPA will be will be hosting the 7th<\/sup> edition of the ID5 in 2021.<\/span><\/p>\n

SAIP organizes IP20+ Global Intellectual Property Challenges Forum<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP)\u00a0recently hosted the IP20+ Global Intellectual Property Challenges Forum on 26th<\/sup> October, 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the event that was previously scheduled to be held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was forced to be held online. The Forum witnessed the presence of all the Heads of the IP offices of in the G20 countries. As reported by official EUIPO website, the IP offices released a Joint Statement identifying the importance of IP and the upcoming direction of the IP20+ initiatives that the offices have adopted to combat the effects of the pandemic.<\/span><\/p>\n

You may click here<\/strong><\/a><\/span> to access the Joint Statement.<\/span><\/p>\n

Authored and compiled by Vibha Amarnath<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

About BIP\u2019s Patent Attorneys<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The patent news bulletin is brought to you by the patent division of BananaIP Counsels, a top patent and IP firm in India. Led by Senior Partners, Somashekar Ramakrishna, Nitin Nair and Vinita Radhakrishnan, BIP\u2019s Patent Attorneys are among the leading patent practitioners in the country. They work with clients such as Mahindra and Mahindra, Samsung, HCL, Eureka Forbes, to name a few. The patent attorneys at BIP have strong technical and legal expertise in areas such as IT\/Software, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning, Data Analytics, Electronics and Telecommunication, Mechanical, Automotive, Green Energy, Traditional Medicine and Bio\/Pharma domains. The firm is a first choice for clients looking for support in patent filing, prosecution, management and strategy in India, and across the world.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

This weekly patent news bulletin is a part of their pro bono work, and is aimed at spreading patent awareness. You are free to share the news with appropriate attribution and backlink to the source.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

If you have any questions, or need any clarifications, please feel free to write to\u00a0<\/em>contact@bananaip.com<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Disclaimer:<\/em><\/strong> Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to contact@bananaip.com<\/a> for corrections and take down.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This bulletin analyses key IP law changes in the UK from January 2021, the integration of Indian designs into the WIPO Global Design Database, and a notable rise in AI patent applications. It also covers important patent litigation and international developments in intellectual property.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":8,"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,6,14],"tags":[3631,183,936,9898,16,3414,108,11106],"class_list":["post-69697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-industrial-designs","category-intellectual-property","category-patents","tag-ai-patents","tag-bananaip-counsels","tag-design-registration","tag-international-ip-news","tag-patent-infringement-2","tag-uk-intellectual-property-law","tag-uspto","tag-wipo-global-design-database"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69697"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69697\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":141240,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69697\/revisions\/141240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}