{"id":68331,"date":"2020-03-26T15:54:50","date_gmt":"2020-03-26T10:24:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=68331"},"modified":"2025-06-27T17:28:43","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T11:58:43","slug":"trademark-examination-statistics-india-weekly-decrease-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/trademark-examination-statistics-india-weekly-decrease-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"61% Decrease in the Trademark Examinations this Week"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>61% decrease in the total trademark applications examined this week, a decrease of 5937 in the total number of applications disposed through show cause hearings and more. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the trademark office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The effects of the Corona virus can be seen on the Indian Trademark Office as well. The total number of trademark applications examined has decreased by sixty one percent (61%). Similarly, there has been a decrease of sixty nine percent (69%) in the total applications disposed through show cause hearings. However, we can still see an increase of fifteen percent (15%) in the total number of registrations granted.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\"><strong>Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>Last Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"226\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"250\"><strong>Change in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">9715<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">3810<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">8645<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">2708<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">15683<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">5577<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 62%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">6381<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">7320<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">An increase of 15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">8459<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">1880<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 78%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Renewal Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">2608<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">1841<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Total Number of New Applications Received between March 18<sup>th<\/sup>, 2020 to March 25<sup>th<\/sup>, 2020<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>\u00a0Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>New Applications<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Examined<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Published<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Registered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">1<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">AHMEDABAD<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">762<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">249<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">750<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">778<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">CHENNAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1389<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">315<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">802<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1102<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">DELHI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">2483<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">701<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1846<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2144<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">KOLKATA<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">452<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">108<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">264<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">248<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">MUMBAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1419<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">348<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1325<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1361<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>6505<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>1721<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>4987<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>5633<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Trademark Statistics from January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2020 to March 25<sup>th<\/sup>, 2020<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Filed \u2013 83954<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Examined \u2013 36114<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Published \u2013 74706<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Registered \u2013 76850<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Authored and compiled by Uma T.S &amp; Shreya Chaddha<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Disclaimer:<\/em><\/strong><em>\u00a0Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"mailto:contact@bananaip.com\"><em>contact@bananaip.com<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0for corrections and take down.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, Indian trademark examination statistics reveal a sharp decline, with a 61 percent decrease in applications examined and notable shifts in other key metrics. The data provides a clear, structured overview of recent trends at the Indian Trademark Office.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":1,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[1717,1258,80,4423,6335,105,2538,10619],"class_list":["post-68331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-indian-trademark-office-2","tag-intellectual-property-india","tag-trademark-application","tag-trademark-examination","tag-trademark-law-india","tag-trademark-registration","tag-trademark-statistics","tag-weekly-trademark-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68331"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":140717,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68331\/revisions\/140717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}