{"id":67758,"date":"2020-01-16T21:55:37","date_gmt":"2020-01-16T16:25:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=67758"},"modified":"2025-06-27T14:47:41","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T09:17:41","slug":"trademark-applications-examined-india-weekly-statistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/trademark-applications-examined-india-weekly-statistics\/","title":{"rendered":"A Whooping increase of 212% Trademark Applications Examined this Week."},"content":{"rendered":"

A Whooping increase of 212 percent in total number of trademark applications examined, a decrease of 2882 in the total hearing notices issued by trademark office and more. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the trademark office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n

INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Last week, the Indian Trademark Office had a mixed week in its working capacity as can be seen from the statistics in the table below. The total number of trademark applications examined by trademark office has tremendously increased by two hundred and twelve percent (212%). Similarly, there has been an increase of fifty-seven (57%) in the total number of applications disposed through show cause hearings. However, we also saw a decrease of thirty eight percent (38%) in the total hearing notices issued.<\/p>\n

Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\nLast Week<\/strong><\/td>\nThis Week<\/strong><\/td>\nChange in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n3586<\/td>\n11181<\/td>\nAn increase of 212%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n3261<\/td>\n5109<\/td>\nAn increase of 57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n5241<\/td>\n6148<\/td>\nAn increase of 17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n9010<\/td>\n7904<\/td>\nA decrease of 12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n7524<\/td>\n4642<\/td>\nA decrease of 38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Renewal Notices Issued<\/td>\n3324<\/td>\n3014<\/td>\nA decrease of 9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Total Number of New Applications Received between January 8th<\/sup>, 2020 to January 16th<\/sup>, 2020<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u00a0Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\nJurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\nNew Applications<\/strong><\/td>\nExamined<\/strong><\/td>\nPublished<\/strong><\/td>\nRegistered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nAHMEDABAD<\/td>\n1076<\/td>\n657<\/td>\n1019<\/td>\n852<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nCHENNAI<\/td>\n1483<\/td>\n866<\/td>\n827<\/td>\n1487<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nDELHI<\/td>\n3332<\/td>\n1692<\/td>\n2157<\/td>\n3140<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nKOLKATA<\/td>\n488<\/td>\n279<\/td>\n160<\/td>\n289<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nMUMBAI<\/td>\n1974<\/td>\n1188<\/td>\n1045<\/td>\n1818<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8353<\/strong><\/td>\n4682<\/strong><\/td>\n5208<\/strong><\/td>\n7586<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Authored and compiled by Shreya Chaddha & Uma T.S<\/strong><\/p>\n

Disclaimer:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to\u00a0<\/em>contact@bananaip.com<\/em><\/a>\u00a0for corrections and take down.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Indian Trademark Office saw a significant 212 percent rise in trademark applications examined this week, along with notable changes in hearings and registrations. The official statistics highlight both increases and decreases across key trademark processes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":1,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[29,2756,5,10751,2037,10226,1732,10623],"class_list":["post-67758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-india","tag-indian-trademark-statistics","tag-intellectual-property","tag-show-cause-hearings","tag-trademark-applications","tag-trademark-journal","tag-trademark-office","tag-trademark-registrations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67758"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67758\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":140600,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67758\/revisions\/140600"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}