{"id":67575,"date":"2020-01-02T15:52:50","date_gmt":"2020-01-02T10:22:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=67575"},"modified":"2025-06-27T12:53:03","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T07:23:03","slug":"trademark-registry-india-holiday-season-statistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/trademark-registry-india-holiday-season-statistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Trademark Registry Witnesses a slow Holiday Season"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Trademark Registry witnesses a slow Holiday Season witnessing a decrease of 32 percent in total hearing notices issued, a decrease of 651 in the total applications published in the trademark journal and more. These statistics have been compiled from the official journal of the trademark office published weekly on Mondays.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Last week, the Indian Trademark Office had a slow week in its working capacity as can be seen from the statistics in the table below. The total number of hearing notices issued has decreased by thirty two percent (32%) with a decrease of eight percent (8%) in the total applications published in the trademark journal.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\"><strong>Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>Last Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"226\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"250\"><strong>Change in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">9085<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">6692<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">3860<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">2687<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">8085<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">7434<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">7209<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">6259<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">8750<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">5953<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 32%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"267\">Total Renewal Notices Issued<\/td>\n<td width=\"181\">2900<\/td>\n<td width=\"226\">1214<\/td>\n<td width=\"250\">A decrease of 58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Total Number of New Applications Received between December 25<sup>th<\/sup>, 2019 to January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2019<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>\u00a0Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>New Applications<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Examined<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Published<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>Registered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">1<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">AHMEDABAD<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">968<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">358<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">877<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">844<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">CHENNAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1226<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">634<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1205<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1036<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">DELHI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">2213<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1023<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2526<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">2598<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">KOLKATA<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">362<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">193<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">257<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">236<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\">MUMBAI<\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\">1437<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">676<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1664<\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\">1295<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"19%\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"18%\"><strong>6206<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>2884<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>6529<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"17%\"><strong>6009<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><strong>Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><u>Trademark Statistics from January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2019 to January 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2020 <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Filed \u2013 336480<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Examined \u2013 152623<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Published \u2013 128313<\/li>\n<li>Total Number of Trademark Applications Registered \u2013 288222<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Authored and compiled by Shreya Chaddha &amp; Uma T.S<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Disclaimer:<\/em><\/strong><em>\u00a0Kindly note that the news bulletin has been put together from different sources, primary and secondary, and BananaIP\u2019s reporters may not have verified all the news published in the bulletin. You may write to\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"mailto:contact@bananaip.com\"><em>contact@bananaip.com<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0for corrections and take down.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Indian Trademark Registry saw decreased activity during the holiday season, with fewer hearing notices and trademark applications published. Official statistics highlight this slowdown across several operational metrics.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":5,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[2756,1258,2037,10849,10226,1732,10848],"class_list":["post-67575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-trademarks","tag-indian-trademark-statistics","tag-intellectual-property-india","tag-trademark-applications","tag-trademark-hearing-notices","tag-trademark-journal","tag-trademark-office","tag-trademark-registry-india"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67575"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67575\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":140552,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67575\/revisions\/140552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}