{"id":46218,"date":"2019-03-06T12:14:10","date_gmt":"2019-03-06T06:44:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=46218"},"modified":"2025-06-20T14:15:28","modified_gmt":"2025-06-20T08:45:28","slug":"flipkart-domain-infringement-trademark-updates-lacoste-jungle-book-mizo-banana","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/flipkart-domain-infringement-trademark-updates-lacoste-jungle-book-mizo-banana\/","title":{"rendered":"Flipkart Wins a Domain Infringement Case, Lacoste Loses a Bite of its Crocodile, Jungle Book Activity Books Coming, Mizo Banana GI, and Other News"},"content":{"rendered":"

Indian Trademark Statistics for March (First Week), Taylor Swift and her Bizarre Trademarks, McDonald\u2019s Loses to Supermac, Flipkart Fights its Domain Squatter and more, brought to you by the Trademark Attorneys at BananaIP (BIP) Counsels.<\/p>\n

TRADEMARK QUOTE OF THE WEEK<\/h2>\n

\u201cRepresentations that do not make sense are the best Trade Marks\u201d \u2013 Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS<\/h2>\n

In the last week, the Indian Trademark Office has had a very slow week. The total number of applications published in the trademark journal has decreased by eighteen percent (18%). Similarly, the total number of registrations granted has decreased by forty Three percent (43%) and the total hearing notices issued has also decreased by thirty six percent (36%).<\/p>\n

Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Particulars<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Last Week<\/strong><\/td>\nThis Week<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

Change in %<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8068<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

5060<\/td>\nA decrease of 37.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

7606<\/td>\n4782<\/td>\nA decrease of 37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n9328<\/td>\n7631<\/td>\n\n

A decrease of 18%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total Registrations Granted<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

9239<\/td>\n5231<\/td>\nA decrease of 43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n10210<\/td>\n6494<\/td>\n\n

A decrease of 36%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Total Renewals Notices Issued<\/td>\n2190<\/td>\n1456<\/td>\n\n

A decrease of 33.5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Total Number of New Applications Received from February 28th<\/sup> to March 06th<\/sup>, 2019<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\nJurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\nNew Applications<\/strong><\/td>\nExamined<\/strong><\/td>\nPublished<\/strong><\/td>\nRegistered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nAHMEDABAD<\/td>\n720<\/td>\n286<\/td>\n795<\/td>\n582<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nCHENNAI<\/td>\n1191<\/td>\n419<\/td>\n1593<\/td>\n1154<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nDELHI<\/td>\n2217<\/td>\n792<\/td>\n2171<\/td>\n1543<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nKOLKATA<\/td>\n357<\/td>\n120<\/td>\n428<\/td>\n399<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nMUMBAI<\/td>\n1376<\/td>\n601<\/td>\n1716<\/td>\n1340<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n5861<\/strong><\/td>\n2218<\/strong><\/td>\n6703<\/strong><\/td>\n5018<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Trademark Statistics from January 01st<\/sup>, 2019 to March 06th<\/sup>, 2019 <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n