{"id":45250,"date":"2019-01-23T18:52:30","date_gmt":"2019-01-23T13:22:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=45250"},"modified":"2025-06-19T14:52:10","modified_gmt":"2025-06-19T09:22:10","slug":"indian-trademark-news-rihanna-oyo-puma-maybelline-gi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/indian-trademark-news-rihanna-oyo-puma-maybelline-gi\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s in a Name Rihanna? Oyo to Expand to Philippines, \u2018Puma x Maybelline\u2019 Athleisure Makeup Collection, and Other News"},"content":{"rendered":"

Indian Trademark Statistics for January (Third Week), The Hotel Ritz Paris Wins Trademark Battle, Drake Loses Exclusive Rights Over \u20186IX\u2019, Lindsay Lohan Discotheque, Naga Cucumber GI, and more, brought to you by the Trademark Attorneys at BananaIP (BIP) Counsels.<\/p>\n

TRADEMARK QUOTE OF THE WEEK<\/h2>\n

\u201cBranding is not just about being seen as better than the competition. It\u2019s about being seen as the only solution to your audience\u2019s problem\u201d \u2013 John Morgan<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

INDIAN TRADEMARK STATISTICS <\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Indian Trademark Office has picked up its pace in the past week. The total number of applications examined by trademark office has increased by ten percent (10%). The total number of applications published in the trademark journal has increased by twenty two percent (22%). However, the total hearing notices issued has decreased by ninety one percent (91%).<\/p>\n

Weekly Indian Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Particulars<\/strong><\/td>\nLast Week<\/strong><\/td>\nThis Week<\/strong><\/td>\nChange in %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Trademark Applications Examined by Trademark Office<\/td>\n8876<\/td>\n9793<\/td>\nAn increase of 10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Applications Disposed through Show Cause Hearings<\/td>\n5723<\/td>\n6605<\/td>\nAn increase of 15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Applications Published in the Trademark Journal<\/td>\n7407<\/td>\n9050<\/td>\nAn increase of 22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Registrations Granted<\/td>\n3684<\/td>\n5077<\/td>\nAn increase of 38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Hearing Notices Issued<\/td>\n9361<\/td>\n880<\/td>\nA decrease of 91%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Renewals Notices Issued<\/td>\n1725<\/td>\n2289<\/td>\nAn increase of 33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Trademark Statistics by Office<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Total Number of New Applications Received from January 16th<\/sup> to January 23rd<\/sup>, 2019<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Sr. No<\/strong><\/td>\nJurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\nNew Applications<\/strong><\/td>\nExamined<\/strong><\/td>\nPublished<\/strong><\/td>\nRegistered<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nAHMEDABAD<\/td>\n957<\/td>\n654<\/td>\n887<\/td>\n439<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nCHENNAI<\/td>\n1272<\/td>\n873<\/td>\n2005<\/td>\n1238<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nDELHI<\/td>\n2756<\/td>\n1704<\/td>\n2329<\/td>\n1654<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nKOLKATA<\/td>\n493<\/td>\n300<\/td>\n449<\/td>\n303<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nMUMBAI<\/td>\n1868<\/td>\n1173<\/td>\n1936<\/td>\n1196<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n7346<\/strong><\/td>\n4704<\/strong><\/td>\n7606<\/strong><\/td>\n4830<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Yearly Trademark Statistics<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Trademark Statistics from January 1st<\/sup>, 2019 to January 23rd<\/sup>, 2019<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n