{"id":43093,"date":"2018-02-19T12:14:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-19T06:44:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/?p=43093"},"modified":"2025-06-16T17:47:19","modified_gmt":"2025-06-16T12:17:19","slug":"gilead-merck-apple-samsung-patent-news-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/gilead-merck-apple-samsung-patent-news-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Gilead v. Merck, Apple v. Samsung, PCT\/ISA\/206, Unity of Invention and other news"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cIn this weeks patent news &#8211; Gilead wins over Merck, Apple suffers setback in Samsung ruling, Google Patent search not searchable, PCT\/ISA\/206, Unity of Invention, \u00a0Patent Tip of the Week and other Weekly Patent News,\u201d presented by the Patent attorneys of BananaIP Counsels.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patent Quote of the Week<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cThere is a great divide in patent law these days. The dividing idea is use versus abuse\u201d \u2013 Gaurav Mishra, Patent Associate, BananaIP Counsels.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Indian Patent Statistics<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There has been a slight increase in the total number of patent applications published between the 10<sup>th<\/sup> of February 2018 and 16<sup>th<\/sup> of February 2018. A total of 709 patent applications have been published, of which, 85 applications account for early publications while 618 applications account for ordinary publications or publications occurring after the 18 month period. A total of 235 applications have been granted between this period which is 3.29% less than the total applications granted in the previous week.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Early Publications<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>City<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>Previous Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>Percentage of change<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Delhi<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">7<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">75% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Mumbai<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">26<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">33<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">26.92% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Chennai<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">18<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">39<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">116.67% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Kolkata<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">13<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">6<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">53.85% decrease<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>61<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>85<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>39.34% increase<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ordinary Publications<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>City<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>Previous Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>Percentage of change<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Delhi<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">223<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">276<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">23.77% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Mumbai<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">44<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">57<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">29.55% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Chennai<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">259<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">189<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">27.03% decrease<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Kolkata<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">19<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">96<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">405.26% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>545<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>618<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>13.39% increase<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TOTAL PUBLICATIONS (Previous Week): 606<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">TOTAL PUBLICATIONS (This Week): 703<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Percentage difference: 16.01% increase<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>PUBLICATIONS UNDER GRANT<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>City<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>Previous Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>This Week<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>Percentage of change<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Delhi<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">89<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">67<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">24.72% decrease<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Mumbai<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">22<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">30<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">36.36% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Chennai<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">67<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">85<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">26.87% increase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\">Kolkata<\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\">65<\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\">53<\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\">18.46% decrease<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"23%\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"25%\"><strong>243<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"24%\"><strong>235<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"26%\"><strong>3.29% decrease<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Number of Applications published based on applicant city<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Of the total 703 patent applications published in the journal last week, Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Kolkata have contributed a total of 142 applications. The total applications from each of the previously mentioned cities for the past week are as follows \u2013 61 from Delhi, 24 from Mumbai, 24 from Bangalore, 19 from Chennai, 9 from Hyderabad and 5 from Kolkata.<\/p>\n<table width=\"93%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\"><strong>List of Cities<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\"><strong>1<sup>st<\/sup>\u00a0January 2018 \u2013 16<sup>th<\/sup> February 2018<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\"><strong>10<sup>th <\/sup>February \u2013 16<sup>th<\/sup> February 2018<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Delhi<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">276<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Mumbai<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">130<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Bangalore<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">112<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Chennai<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">80<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Hyderabad<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">75<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"31%\">Kolkata<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">18<\/td>\n<td width=\"34%\">5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Total number of applications published by the Indian Patent Office from the 1st of January 2018 till date: 5386<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Early publications: 475<\/li>\n<li>Ordinary Publications: 4911<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Total number of patents granted by the Indian Patent Office from the 1st of January 2018 till date: 1782<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Delhi \u2013 699<\/li>\n<li>Mumbai \u2013 239<\/li>\n<li>Chennai \u2013 571<\/li>\n<li>Kolkata \u2013 334<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>First Examination Report (FER) Statistics <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A total of 1052 FER\u2019s have been issued last week. Applicants and their agents can check if any of their patent applications have been examined by referring the journal available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipindia.nic.in\/writereaddata\/Portal\/IPOJournal\/1_2585_1\/Part-2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a><strong>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\"><strong>City<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"169\"><strong>No. of FER Issued<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\">Delhi<\/td>\n<td width=\"169\">363<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\">Mumbai<\/td>\n<td width=\"169\">154<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\">Chennai<\/td>\n<td width=\"169\">353<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\">Kolkata<\/td>\n<td width=\"169\">182<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"169\"><strong>Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"169\"><strong>1052<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Indian Industrial Designs Statistics<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The designs office has registered a total of 211 designs this week. The total designs registered from the 1<sup>st<\/sup> of January 2018 till date now adds to a total of 1481 applications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Total designs registered in the previous Week: 210<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Total designs registered this Week: 211<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Percentage Difference: 0.48% increase<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Total designs registered from the 1st of January 2018 till date: 1481<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Interesting Patents &amp; Designs<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The patent journal of 16<sup>th<\/sup> February 2018 is replete with interesting patent applications. A few of these interesting patent applications are listed below:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patent Application 1: REUSABLE MENSTRUAL SANITARY PAD<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Applicant: SC JAIN &amp; SONS PVT. LTD.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Application No.: 201611022014<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Abstract: <em>\u201cA reusable menstural sanitary pad comprising of an upper layer made of high absorbency fabric, the absorbent filler, in the side receiving the mensural discharge; a back cover or barrier layer formed by non absorbant material; optionally one or more middle layers for better absorbency and better cushioning; wherein the sanitary pad is made of azo-free material to prevent any reaction, itch or rash.\u201d (The abstract has been taken from the patent specification as is and has not been corrected for errors.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patent Application 2: PRE AND POST ACCIDENT PREVENTING DEVICE<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Applicant: PAWAR KUNAL KALYANRAO<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Application No.: 201821003798<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Abstract: <em>\u201cThe invented the device is a pre-accident and post-accident preventing and supporting device which will be installed in the car and connected to the cloud server which can be accessed on a web browser or on mobile application. With this invention we are focusing on the human safety, and safe driving for the humans which help to save the others life and save himself. Device contains sensors like alcohol sensor, fingerprint sensor which will detect the person is drunk and is above 18 years respectively and then start the car. The invented device sends location and an emergency message to nearby hospitals, police stations and relatives if accident occurs. Also takes care that all documentation needed in hospital like admit form filling, medical insurance approval, will be automatically done by the device system if accident occurs. It also provides facility that any car with emergency patient gets a way to hospital from traffic quickly as possible by informing the other cars in that route.\u201d (The abstract has been taken from the patent specification as is and has not been corrected for errors.)<\/em><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patent Infringement, Disputes, Settlements<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>One for Gilead, None for Merck<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gilead Sciences\u00a0which was recently asked to pay $2.54 billion to Merck pharmaceuticals for infringing a patent relating to Merck\u2019s blockbuster hepatitis C drugs has finally found relief after U.S. District Court Judge Leonard Stark ruled in favor of Gilead. Judge Stark ruled that Merck\u2019s patent at issue was invalid as the invention did not meet the minimum requirement for enablement and did not disclose \u201chow to make and use the treatment\u201d without undue experimentation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The verdict is said to be the largest ever in a U.S. patent case, stemming from a long-running dispute concerning the Sovaldi and Harvoni hepatitis C pills.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Apple suffers minor setback in dispute with Samsung<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While Apple has been basking itself in back to back victories against Qualcomm, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh\u2019s ruling in the matter of a dispute between Apple and Samsung is sure to leave Apple sour. Judge Lucy in her Thursday ruling, agreed\u00a0with Samsung that the South Korea smartphone manufacturer owed Apple about $6.4 million, but not the ongoing royalties to which Apple claimed it was entitled to. Apple did not comment on the ruling and it remains to be seen whether Apple would appeal against the ruling considering that the two companies recently entered into a cross licensing agreement.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">International Patent Update<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Google makes Old \u2018Google Patent\u2019 search inaccessible<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Google patents has been the go-to patent search portal for many inventors and applicants. In July 2015, Google had launched a new version of the Google Patent Search at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/patents.google.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">patents.google.com<\/a>. The old version at was however still accessible via\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/patents\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">google.com\/patents<\/a>. Having conducted searches on both the old and new google patent search pages, the old search page was far more accurate in terms of the results. There is something missing in the new version which has led people to abstain from using the new search portal. Many users want Google to restore access to the old version of google patent search.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\">BananaIP\u2019s Patent \/ Design Tip of the Week<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>PCT\/ISA\/206 and Unity of Invention<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A PCT\/ISA\/206 is usually issued by the International Searching Authority when the ISA believes that the international application does not meet the requirement of unity of invention. In such an instance the ISA invites the applicant to pay additional fees, specifying the reasons for its finding and indicating the number of additional fees to be paid. The applicant in such an instance has 3 ways to respond:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Pay the search fee for all the additional inventions along with the protest fee.<\/li>\n<li>Pay the search fee for all the additional inventions without any protest.<\/li>\n<li>Do no pay any additional fees and let the ISA prepare a search report only for the claims that the ISA believes forms a single invention.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Author: BIP\u2019s Patent Attorneys<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If you have any questions, you may write to BIP&#8217;s Patent Attorneys &#8211; <a href=\"mailto:contact@bananaip.com\">contact@bananaip.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post delivers key updates on Indian patent statistics and major infringement disputes, including Gilead v Merck and Apple v Samsung. It also examines procedural issues in PCT applications and highlights recent changes to patent search tools and design registrations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":3,"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,6,14],"tags":[8954,8953,1837,7832,16,2280,310,8955],"class_list":["post-43093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-industrial-designs","category-intellectual-property","category-patents","tag-apple-v-samsung","tag-gilead-v-merck","tag-indian-patents","tag-international-patent","tag-patent-infringement-2","tag-patent-news","tag-patent-statistics","tag-pct-isa-206"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43093"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43093\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":136568,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43093\/revisions\/136568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}