{"id":25638,"date":"2015-06-18T13:38:50","date_gmt":"2015-06-18T08:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/sinapse\/?p=25638"},"modified":"2026-06-09T10:31:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T05:01:18","slug":"us-india-patent-statistics-comparison-2015-top-companies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/us-india-patent-statistics-comparison-2015-top-companies\/","title":{"rendered":"The Amazing Race: US and India Patent Statistics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Overview<\/h2>\n

A comparison of patent statistics for the top ten technology companies in the United States and India for the period 1 January to 31 May 2015 was conducted using published data from the Indian Patent Office and Sqoop. The analysis covers two categories: granted patents and published patent applications.<\/p>\n

Granted Patents: January\u2013May 2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Company<\/th>\nIndian Patents<\/th>\nUS Patents<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
International Business Machines Corporation<\/td>\n128<\/td>\n3,059<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Samsung<\/td>\n43<\/td>\n3,052<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1,782<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LG<\/td>\n37<\/td>\n1,484<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Google Inc<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1,083<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sony Corporation<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n1,074<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Microsoft<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n1,037<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Qualcomm Incorporated<\/td>\n115<\/td>\n1,034<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n1,022<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Panasonic<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n896<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

In India, the top three positions for granted patents were held by International Business Machines Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, and Samsung respectively. In the United States, the top three were Samsung, Qualcomm Incorporated, and Sony Corporation.<\/p>\n

Published Patent Applications: January\u2013May 2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Company<\/th>\nIndian Patents<\/th>\nUS Patents<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Samsung<\/td>\n146<\/td>\n2,487<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
International Business Machines Corporation<\/td>\n1000<\/td>\n1,764<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n989<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LG<\/td>\n56<\/td>\n856<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
General Electric Company<\/td>\n84<\/td>\n664<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Qualcomm Incorporated<\/td>\n564<\/td>\n617<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.<\/td>\n56<\/td>\n561<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sony Corporation<\/td>\n153<\/td>\n528<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hyundai Motor Company<\/td>\n57<\/td>\n514<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n462<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

For published patent applications, the top three positions in India were held by International Business Machines Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, and Sony Corporation. In the United States, the top three were Samsung, International Business Machines Corporation, and Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba.<\/p>\n

Disclaimer<\/h2>\n

This article is for general information and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult a qualified attorney before acting on any matter discussed here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This post examines US and India patent statistics for major technology companies in early 2015. It highlights key trends in granted and published patents, offering insights into the competitive landscape of intellectual property. The analysis underscores significant differences in patent activity between the two jurisdictions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":30,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,14],"tags":[7235,1837,12899,3616,114,310,6928,1111],"class_list":["post-25638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","category-patents","tag-2015-statistics","tag-indian-patents","tag-patent-design-statistics","tag-patent-filings","tag-patent-grants","tag-patent-statistics","tag-technology-companies","tag-us-patents"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25638"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":149816,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25638\/revisions\/149816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}