{"id":21099,"date":"2015-02-24T11:00:05","date_gmt":"2015-02-24T05:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/one\/sinapse\/?p=21099"},"modified":"2025-05-30T15:07:12","modified_gmt":"2025-05-30T09:37:12","slug":"qualcomm-record-antitrust-fine-china-patent-royalty-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/qualcomm-record-antitrust-fine-china-patent-royalty-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Qualcomm Inc. to pay record fine of US$ 975 Mn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">US chipmaker, Qualcomm Inc., has put an end to the 14-month anti-trust investigation by the Chinese Government by agreeing to pay a record fine of US$ 975 Mn. Qualcomm has also been asked to lower its royalty rates on patents used in China, thereby providing a boost to domestic handset manufacturers like Xiaomi and Huawei.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Qualcomm Inc. is facing similar charges in the US and Europe as well. South Korea has also started investigating similar monopolistic practices by Qualcomm. The judgment by the Chinese Government is likely to be only a small setback for Qualcomm Inc. as it is required to pay a fee it can easily afford &#8211; around 8% of its annual sales in China and in turn it gets to retain a majority of its patent licenses. After the judgment, Qualcomm\u00a0 Inc. shares soared 1.6 percent to US$ 68.12.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Commenting on whether the judgment in China would have an impact on the ongoing trials in the US and Europe, Derek Aberle, President of Qualcomm Inc. said,<em> &#8220;We fully respect their authority, but we don\u2019t believe it\u2019s likely that other agencies will necessarily meet similar conclusions&#8221;.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">China is a huge marketplace as its high speed 4G network is creating demand for cutting edge smartphones, but the anti-trust judgment is likely to affect Qualcomm Inc.\u2019s opportunities. Qualcomm has decided not to contest the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)\u2019s verdict that it dishonored the Chinese anti-trust law.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">A few industry experts believe that the fresh Chinese patent rules might actually make it simpler for Qualcomm Inc. to collect royalties on device patents and sign contracts with new vendors. Qualcomm Inc. has however, reduced its 2015 share-price forecast by US$ 0.58 per share owing to patent issues. It will be interesting to see the way the trials in the US, Europe and South Korea shape up and the impact these judgments will have on Qualcomm\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/2928796-2-reasons-why-china-settlement-turns-qualcomm-into-a-buy-and-one-reason-why-im-still-concerned?page=2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Image Source\/Attribution: <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Qualcomm#mediaviewer\/File:Qualcomm_headquarters.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>\u00a0(This is governed by Creative Commons License <a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Qualcomm Inc. has agreed to pay a record antitrust fine and lower patent royalties in China, concluding a major investigation. The outcome may affect ongoing antitrust cases against Qualcomm in other jurisdictions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":24,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[2228,1807,1278,7021,7022,5866,2315,5472],"class_list":["post-21099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intellectual-property","tag-antitrust","tag-china","tag-competition-law","tag-global-litigation","tag-ndrcl","tag-patent-royalty","tag-qualcomm","tag-technology-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21099"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21099\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":132748,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21099\/revisions\/132748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bananaip.com\/intellepedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}