Promodome Communication Private Limited (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d), is a company engaged in the business of advertising, communication, branding, audio-visual productions, digital content, and allied communication services under the registered PROMODOME trademarks \u2018PROMODOME\u2019, \u2018PROMODOME DIGITAL\u2019, and \u2018PROMODOME COMMUNICATIONS\u2019. The Plaintiff also operates and maintains its official website, https:\/\/promodomegroup.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n In 2021, the Plaintiff discovered that the Defendant, Promodome Digital LLP, a digital marketing agency, incorporated in July 2020 was operating a website, https:\/\/promodome.in<\/a> (\u201cImpugned Domain Name\u201d) and social media handles under the brand name \u2018PROMODOME DIGITAL\u2019. Upon inquiry, the Plaintiff found instances of confusion among clients and vendors who believed the two entities were connected.<\/p>\n Aggrieved by the Defendant\u2019s conduct, the Plaintiff instituted a suit before the Delhi High Court seeking a permanent injunction against infringement, passing off and other reliefs. To prevent the Defendant from disposing of, concealing or suppressing its infringing business operations and digital footprints, the Plaintiff also sought an urgent ex-parte ad-interim injunction along with the appointment of the Local Commissioner.<\/p>\n The Court observed that this was a classic case of triple identity:<\/p>\n The Court held that the Plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for the grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction. \u00a0Accordingly, until the next date of hearing, the Court directed that the Defendant, its partners, agents, and representatives be restrained as follows:<\/p>\nPlaintiff\u2019s Contentions<\/h5>\n
\n
\n
Court\u2019s findings and decision<\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n