Skip to content

Intellepedia

IP News Center

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

Delhi HC rules in Favour of Louis Vuitton in Trademark Dispute

Author: Intellepedia
June 24, 2016
Intellectual Property, Trademarks

Trademarks are known as business identifiers and they play an indispensable role in the growth of a particular business. With the globalization of markets , growing importance of brand advertising for manufacturers and subsequent brand awareness of consumers, trademarks have become increasingly important and valuable. Trade marks are crucial trading instruments because consumers ascertain the quality and standard of goods and services with the trade source.While trademark laws provide monopoly rights to the proprietor of a mark to use and promote it in the market, they also help the consumers to identify a particular trademark with the quality of goods and services.
Louis Vuitton is a leading name in the fashion industry and the products manufactured by them guarantee a particular standard of quality. From 2006 to 2012 Louis Vuitton was named as the world’s most valuable luxury brand.
The Delhi High Court has recently restrained a Ludhiana based firm and three other individuals from dealing with goods bearing the well-known trademark Louis Vuitton.  The Delhi High Court has passed an interim order in favor of Louis Vuitton after finding that the defendants were using the registered mark of Louis Vuitton on their counterfeited products. Such use of registered trademark without the permission of the proprietor is actionable under the trademark law. The interim order was passed by Justice Manmohan Singh. The fashion house was able to prove prima facie case against the firm which dealt with goods bearing their registered mark.
The Delhi High Court stated the following, “Till the next date of hearing, the defendants (firm), their partners, if any, officers, servants, agents, distributors, stockists and representatives are restrained from manufacturing, selling and/or offering for sale,…. or directly or indirectly dealing in goods/labels, … bearing the trademarks Louis Vuitton, the LV logo, the Toile monogram pattern, the Damier pattern and the LV Flower pattern, or any similar trademark amounting to an infringement of plaintiff s registered trademarks, copyrights as also passing off,” 
The matter is listed for further hearing on October 4, 2016. In addition to passing an interim order, the Court has also appointed two local commissioners who need to make an inventory of all the infringing goods.  The fashion house has also prayed for a permanent injunction against the firm. Damages of over Rs 1 crore has been sought by Louis Vuitton from the firm.
Authored by Sudha Sameekshya
Image Source/ Attribution here , Governed BY Creative Commons License CC BY 2.0

You Might Also Want To Read

Indian IP Office Schedules Stakeholder Meetings in Kolkata and Chennai on Draft CRI Guidelines

3 days ago

Generative AI Training and Copyright: U.S. Copyright Office’s Pre-Publication Report

6 days ago

Compulsory Music License for Events: Delhi HC Rules Against PPL’s Licensing Practices

4 days ago

AI Accessibility Tools and Innovations for Persons with Blindness – GAAD 2025

3 days ago

Captain Morgan Prevails Over Captain Blue in Trade Mark Dispute

5 days ago

Category

Intellectual Property, Trademarks

Tags

2016, Delhi High Court, infringement, Injunction, interim order, Justice manmohan singh, Louis Vuitton, Ludhiana, luxury brand, LV logo, Passing off, Trademark

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: India protests against The European Union Trademark Reforms
Next Next post: Latest updates in Copyright case decisions

Coming Soon

The Business of Copyrights (2025 Edition)

A Book by Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala

Want to be the first to know when it’s out?


Register Your Interest »

Featured

BananaIP’s Comments on Draft CRI Guidelines for AI, ML, and Blockchain Patents

by Sowmya S Murthy

Indian Patent & Design Statistics Report – 2025

by Intellepedia

Divisional Patent Filing, Patent Claim Amendments, Assessment of Damages, and DUS test for PV Protection

by Intellepedia

Offbeat and Out of Tune: Copyright’s Missing Rhythm in Indian Music

by Dr. Kalyan Kankanala

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Inventions and Patents

by Dr. Kalyan Kankanala

Categories

  • Accessibility
  • Announcement
  • Biological Diversity
  • Case Reviews
  • Case Study
  • Copyrights
  • e-Commerce Law
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO)
  • General
  • Geographical Indications (GI)
  • Industrial Designs
  • Intellectual Property
  • IP and Antitrust/Competition
  • IP Audits
  • IP Commercialization/Licensing
  • IP for Start Ups
  • IP Training
  • IP Valuation
  • Job Postings
  • Media and Entertainment Law
  • Open Source Licensing
  • Patent & Design Statistics
  • Patents
  • Plant Varieties
  • Press Release
  • Privacy / Data Protection
  • Publicity Rights/ Celebrity Rights
  • Social Media Law
  • Software
  • Sports Law
  • Trade Secrets
  • Trademarks
  • Traditional Knowledge

Popular Posts

Only Copyright Societies Can Issue Licenses: Delhi High Court Strikes a Blow to Music Licensing Practices of PPL, Novex, and Others

1 month ago 3512 views

Non Use of Trademark Leads to Cancellation: Delhi High Court favors Zepto

4 weeks ago 2285 views

Trademarks In The Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions From India Part – 2

2 years ago 2043 views

PS2 Copyright Case: AR Rahman vs Dagar Brothers — Delhi HC Orders Credit, ₹2 Cr Deposit

3 weeks ago 2041 views

Copyright Vs Design Protection: Supreme Court’s Purely Artistic and Functional Utility Tests

1 month ago 1906 views

Patent Rejection for Vehicle Monitoring System reversed by Court

2 weeks ago 1775 views

New Geographical Indications Registrations in India (April 2024–March 2025): 23 Additions Across States

2 weeks ago 1592 views

Decades of Himalaya’s Goodwill Shield PILEX Trademark from Deceptive Use

2 weeks ago 1580 views

Indian IP Office Announces Stakeholder Meetings on Draft CRI Guidelines

1 week ago 1277 views

Indian IP Office Rolls Out Utility for Patent, Design, Trademark, Copyright & GI Statistics

4 weeks ago 1189 views

Regents’ Patent on Live Salmonella Vaccine Fails to Meet Disclosure Requirements, Court Rules

1 month ago 1134 views

Court Affirms Controller’s Refusal: Invention deemed obvious to a person skilled in the art

3 weeks ago 1123 views

Wipro Secures Court Victory Against Trademark Infringement

2 weeks ago 1121 views

Toy Building Block Design: Defendant’s silence equals admission of infringement

4 weeks ago 1114 views

Failure to consider Post-filing data violates natural Justice, reiterates Calcutta High Court

2 weeks ago 1051 views

Hybrid Cell Inventions: Section 3(j) of the Patents Act Does Not Apply

1 month ago 1016 views

Numerical Trademarks and Their Registrability: A Review of the 2929 Case

3 weeks ago 1004 views

Failure to Disclose Prior Art in Hearing Notice Violates Procedural Fairness, Rules Calcutta High Court

4 weeks ago 979 views

Can an Oversight by a Patent Agent Be a Ground for Abandoned Patent Application Revival?

3 weeks ago 951 views

BananaIP Counsels Invites Applications for the Position of Trademark Associate

3 weeks ago 919 views

Visit BananaIP Counsels Website

https://www.bananaip.com

Disclaimer

Intellepedia is an independent knowledge-sharing initiative. All opinions expressed by individual authors are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of any organisation or firm with which they may be affiliated.

We welcome your questions, suggestions, and corrections. If you are interested in contributing as an author, please write to us. Intellectual property experts and professionals from all related fields are welcome to participate.

Contribute to Intellepedia

contact@intellepedia.org

Archives

  • Home
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyrights
  • Designs
  • Trade Secrets

© 2025 Intellepedia. All Rights Reserved.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement