The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers Union, prohibiting Bio Logic from using the “AMUL” trademark for pharmaceutical products. The court found Bio Logic’s use of the trademark deliberate and awarded Kaira Rs. 5,00,000 in damages and costs.
Read more about Pharma company’s buttery slip : Court Stops Trademark Infringement of ‘AMUL’Tag: trademark law
“Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court orders a fresh review of Seiwa Kasei’s ‘PHYTOCUTICLE’ trademark application, challenging the Registrar’s refusal for lack of distinctiveness.
Read more about “Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High CourtWrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set Aside
The Delhi High Court restored the opposition in the ‘SIGNUM GROUP’ trademark dispute, correcting an abandonment caused by a Registrar’s error. The case highlights procedural issues in trademark registration and opposition management.
Read more about Wrong Documents Served, Abandonment of Opposition Set AsidePrakash Pipes prevails over later trademark for ‘Prakash’
The Madras High Court granted a rectification petition filed by Prakash Pipes Limited, canceling Mr. Rama’s ‘PRAKASH’ trademark for non-use. The Court found the registration to be malicious, aimed at unlawful enrichment, and noted the Petitioner’s long-standing rights and goodwill associated with the trademark.
Read more about Prakash Pipes prevails over later trademark for ‘Prakash’Only Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of Visa International Ltd., quashing orders issued by Associate Managers who lacked the legal authority under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The court emphasized the necessity of proper authorization for quasi-judicial functions within the Trademark Registry.
Read more about Only Officers having Quasi Judicial Authority Can Pass Trademark Orders, says the Calcutta High CourtDISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not Received
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal order for the ‘DISPOWAY’ trademark after confirming that Disposafe Health And Life Care Limited did not receive the hearing notice. The court remanded the matter to the Registrar of Trademarks, directing the issuance of a fresh notice and restoration of the application.
Read more about DISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not ReceivedEvaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion
The Gujarat High Court’s decision in the Unisn vs. Unison case provides critical insights into evaluating trademark infringement. The court emphasized a holistic view of trademarks, considering the distinctiveness of goods and services, thereby ruling out the likelihood of confusion. This case reinforces the importance of product differentiation in trademark disputes.
Read more about Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of ConfusionKey High Court IP Decisions: Summaries and Implications
Gain insights into the latest Intellectual Property cases from the Delhi High Court. Understand key legal developments and their impact.
Read more about Key High Court IP Decisions: Summaries and ImplicationsDeciphering Intellectual Property: A Deep Dive into Recent Indian High Court Judgements
Discover key Intellectual Property rulings from Indian High Courts in our latest BananaIP blog. Dive into concise case overviews, including trademark and patent disputes, providing valuable legal insights.
Read more about Deciphering Intellectual Property: A Deep Dive into Recent Indian High Court JudgementsIndian Courts on Trademark Law: Key Decisions Review – Part 8
Explore the Delhi High Court’s latest judgments in trademark law, analyzing the distinctiveness and registrability of ‘NATURE’S VARIETY’, ‘Kavach’, and ‘Oleev Active’, and their impact on Indian intellectual property rights.
Read more about Indian Courts on Trademark Law: Key Decisions Review – Part 8