The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the Indian Patent Office (IPO) must clearly and unambiguously articulate objections to patent applications. This case involved Microsoft’s patent application for “Discovery of Secure Network Enclaves,” which was rejected by the IPO for lacking inventive step and violating disclosure requirements. The Court found the IPO’s objections to be ambiguous and procedurally irregular, thereby stressing on fair hearings and proper communication during the patent examination process.
Read more about Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguousTag: IP Case Review
Trademarks in the Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions from India Part – 6
Delving deeper into the nuances of trademark law, "Trademarks in the Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions from India, Part-6" presents a fresh compilation of judgments where the...
Read more about Trademarks in the Courtroom: Noteworthy Decisions from India Part – 6